Independent Yaw Authority in Distributed-Thrust Aircraft Transition

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current VTOL aircraft face challenges in control during hover and transition between thrust-borne and wing-borne flight modes, particularly due to downwash inefficiencies and complex control requirements.

Innovation Solution

The aircraft employs a distributed thrust array with multiple independent yaw authority mechanisms, including differential speed control of rotor assemblies, differential longitudinal control surface maneuvers, and differential thrust vectoring, to achieve stable and efficient flight operations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If tiltrotor aircraft use fixed wing during vertical takeoff and landing, then structural support is provided, but downwash inefficiencies occur due to interference from the fixed wing

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural supportVSAvoiddownwash inefficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The aircraft separates the functions of lift generation and thrust provision by removing the fixed wing during vertical operations, allowing the propellers to operate independently without aerodynamic interference from wing structures, thus eliminating downwash inefficiencies while maintaining structural support through the airframe and landing gear

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The aircraft employs dynamic reconfiguration where the fixed wing is selectively deployed or removed based on flight phase - present during forward flight for lift, and absent during vertical operations to eliminate interference - optimizing performance for each operational mode

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Loss of energy

If tiltwing aircraft use vertically tilted wing for vertical takeoff and landing, then slipstream efficiency is improved, but control during hover becomes more difficult due to large surface area exposed to crosswinds

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveslipstream efficiencyVSAvoidhover control
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The aircraft separates the wing function from the vertical lift function by using independent proprotors mounted on nacelles that can operate vertically without the wing in the way, eliminating the crosswind exposure problem while maintaining slipstream efficiency through proper propeller positioning and rotation plane orientation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The aircraft changes the operational dimension by rotating the proprotor rotation plane from horizontal (when mounted on vertical wing) to vertical plane, allowing the thrust to be directed horizontally for forward flight while eliminating the wing's interference with the slipstream during vertical operations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Ease of operation

If VTOL aircraft use complex control mechanisms for hover stability, then control authority is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehover control authorityVSAvoidcontrol mechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The flight control system serves multiple functions simultaneously - it controls the cyclic rotor control for hover stability, manages the tilt mechanism for transitioning between vertical and horizontal flight, and coordinates the proprotor pitch and roll - reducing the need for separate dedicated control mechanisms for each function

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The aircraft merges the cyclic rotor control with the tilt mechanism control, where the same control inputs that manage hover stability also drive the transition to forward flight, eliminating the need for separate control systems and reducing overall device complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This configuration enables improved control and efficiency during both thrust-borne and wing-borne flight modes, enhancing the aircraft's versatility and stability, particularly in hover and transition phases.

Implementation Method 1

each having a rotor assembly operable for generating thrust

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectRotational motion generating thrust: Centrifugal Force

Implementation Method 2

a two-dimensional distributed thrust array including a plurality of gimbal mounted propulsion systems each operable for two-axis thrust vectoring

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThrust vectoring: Gimbal

Implementation Method 3

A second yaw authority mechanism includes differential longitudinal control surface maneuvers of control surfaces of two symmetrically disposed tail members

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAerodynamic force generation: Aerofoil

Implementation Method 4

Fixed-wing aircraft are capable of flight using wings that generate lift responsive to the forward airspeed of the aircraft

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLift generation: Aerofoil

Data Source

PatentUS10981661B2Aircraft having multiple independent yaw authority mechanisms
Publication Date: 2021.04.20 TEXTRON INNOVATIONS INC
  • US10981661B2 patent drawing
  • US10981661B2 patent drawing
  • US10981661B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An aircraft has multiple independent yaw authority mechanisms. The aircraft includes an airframe having first and second wings with at least first and second pylons extending therebetween and with a plurality of tail members extending therefrom each having an active control surface. A two-dimensional distributed thrust array is coupled to the airframe that includes a plurality of propulsion assemblies each having a rotor assembly and each operable for thrust vectoring. A flight control system is operable to independently control each of the propulsion assemblies. A first yaw authority mechanism includes differential speed control of rotor assemblies rotating clockwise compared to rotor assemblies rotating counterclockwise. A second yaw authority mechanism includes differential longitudinal control surface maneuvers of control surfaces of two symmetrically disposed tail members. A third yaw authority mechanism includes differential thrust vectoring of propulsion assemblies.