Multi-Zone Heat Exchanger Cooling With Independent Fan Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing cooling systems for heat-producing systems, such as vehicle engines, lack the ability to independently control each heat exchanger zone, leading to overcooling or undercooling of different subsystems, which increases size, complexity, and energy consumption while failing to optimize thermal management.

Innovation Solution

A cooling system with multiple independent cooling zones and fan assemblies, where each zone has its own inlet and outlet for temperature control fluid and is cooled by a dedicated fan, allowing for independent air flow and temperature control across each zone.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If a single fan cools multiple heat exchanger zones, then device complexity is reduced, but temperature control precision deteriorates leading to overcooling or undercooling

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecooling system complexityVSAvoidtemperature control precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The cooling system is segmented into multiple independent cooling zones, each with its own fan assembly. This allows each zone to be controlled independently, preventing overcooling or undercooling of specific heat producing systems while maintaining manageable system complexity through modular design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Each cooling zone is equipped with local control capabilities through dedicated fan assemblies, allowing temperature control to be optimized for each specific zone's requirements. This local quality approach ensures that each heat producing system receives appropriate cooling independent of other zones.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Measurement precision

If multiple independent fan assemblies are used for each cooling zone, then temperature control precision is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetemperature control precisionVSAvoidcooling system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system is divided into independent modular zones, each with its own fan assembly. This segmentation allows for precise temperature control in each zone while managing overall complexity through standardized modular components that can be independently installed and maintained.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Each fan assembly is designed to serve its specific cooling zone with universal mounting and control characteristics. This multi-functionality approach allows the same basic fan assembly design to be used across different zones, reducing complexity through standardization while maintaining independent control capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Device complexity

If a single heat exchanger cools multiple systems, then device complexity is reduced, but adaptability deteriorates when different cooling needs arise

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvethermal management system complexityVSAvoidcooling zone independence
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The heat exchanger is segmented into multiple independent cooling zones that can be individually activated or deactivated. This segmentation provides adaptability to meet different cooling requirements for various heat producing systems while maintaining a unified heat exchanger structure that manages overall complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The cooling system incorporates dynamic control capabilities where each zone's fan assembly can be independently adjusted based on real-time cooling requirements. This dynamic adaptability allows the system to respond to varying thermal demands of different heat producing systems while maintaining a cohesive overall structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This solution enables precise temperature control for each heat-producing system, reducing energy consumption, optimizing thermal management, and minimizing system size and complexity by allowing independent operation of each cooling zone.

Implementation Method 1

A first fan assembly is disposed proximate the first zone, and includes a first fan that is operable to move air across the first zone

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectForced Convection: Forced Convection

Implementation Method 2

a heat exchanger including first and second cooling zones. The first cooling zone includes a first inlet for receiving a first temperature control fluid

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeat Exchanger: Heat Exchanger

Data Source

PatentUS7406835B2Cooling system and method for cooling a heat producing system
Publication Date: 2008.08.05 EMP ADVANCED DEVELOPMENT LLC
  • US7406835B2 patent drawing
  • US7406835B2 patent drawing
  • US7406835B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A cooling system for cooling a plurality of heat producing systems includes a heat exchanger having a plurality of cooling zones, each of which has a respective inlet and outlet for facilitating flow of a respective temperature control fluid therethrough. Each of the respective temperature control fluids facilitates temperature control of a respective heat producing system. A plurality of fans cool the temperature control fluids flowing through the heat exchanger, and a fan or fans are disposed proximate each zone of the heat exchanger to provide air flow substantially independently from the air flow over the other cooling zones.