Cushions including one or more zones of different materials and related methods of manufacture for improved yield

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The existing methods for manufacturing cushioning elements, such as mattresses and seat cushions, are inefficient due to the high cost and waste of molds required for producing multiple sizes, leading to significant labor expenses and reduced yield.

Innovation Solution

A method of forming a king-size elastomeric cushion with intersecting buckling walls, which is then separated into four equal-sized cushioning elements, allowing for the selection and use of smaller elements to create cushions of various sizes, thereby reducing material waste and labor costs.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If manufacturers purchase the largest mold needed (e.g., king size) and use it to form all different sizes, then the number of molds is reduced, but material waste increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenumber of moldsVSAvoidmaterial waste
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The king-size cushioning element is divided into multiple smaller cushioning elements of different sizes (queen, full, twin) by making cuts along predetermined lines. This segmentation allows a single king-size mold to produce multiple smaller cushions, reducing material waste while avoiding the need for multiple specialized molds for each size.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Device complexity

If the largest mold is used to produce smaller sizes, then mold inventory cost is reduced, but labor costs for trimming and handling excess material increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemold inventoryVSAvoidlabor time
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The cushioning element is pre-formed in the king-size mold with internal structures (walls, voids, columns) already configured to accommodate multiple smaller cushion sizes. The predetermined cut lines are established during the molding process, so that subsequent separation requires minimal additional processing. This preliminary configuration reduces the labor and time required for trimming and handling excess material compared to forming each size separately.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Productivity

If a single king-size cushion is formed and then separated into four equal-sized elements, then yield and efficiency increase, but the ability to produce different cushion sizes is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing efficiencyVSAvoidsize variety
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The king-size cushioning element contains asymmetrically positioned walls, voids, and columns that create regions of different dimensions and characteristics. When cuts are made along predetermined lines, these asymmetric features naturally produce smaller cushioning elements with different sizes and properties (e.g., queen, full, twin sizes) from a single king-size form, thus achieving both high productivity and size variety.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

Data Source

PatentUS20190150631A1Cushions including one or more zones of different materials and related methods of manufacture for improved yield
Publication Date: 2019.05.23 PURPLE INNOVATION LLC
  • US20190150631A1 patent drawing
  • US20190150631A1 patent drawing
  • US20190150631A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of forming a cushioning element including forming a large cushioning element, and then dividing the large cushioning element into four equal smaller cushioning elements. The four smaller cushioning elements may be substantially the same size. Each of the smaller cushioning elements may be used as separate cushioning elements.