Multi-Zone Catalyst Regenerator Coke Removal

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing catalyst regeneration processes are limited by coke buildup, which reduces catalyst effectiveness and requires improved control over combustion conditions to extend catalyst life and increase regeneration efficiency.

Innovation Solution

A multi-stage regeneration process with independent gas loops and varying oxygen concentrations and temperatures in upper and lower burn zones, allowing for more precise control over coke removal and catalyst rejuvenation, including additional stages for further processing and halogenation to redistribute catalytic metals.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If a single-stage combustion process is used for catalyst regeneration, then the process is simpler to operate, but coke removal efficiency is insufficient and catalyst life is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecoke removal efficiencyVSAvoidregeneration process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The regenerator is divided into multiple combustion zones (first combustion zone with lower oxygen concentration and second combustion zone with higher oxygen concentration), allowing different stages of coke combustion to occur under optimized conditions. This segmentation improves coke removal efficiency while managing the complexity through functional zoning rather than complete process redesign.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different regions of the regenerator are assigned different oxygen concentrations and temperature profiles tailored to specific combustion stages. The first combustion zone uses milder conditions (lower oxygen) to remove easily combustible coke, while the second combustion zone uses stronger conditions (higher oxygen) for refractory coke, optimizing local combustion conditions for each zone's specific function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Productivity

If high oxygen concentration is used throughout the combustion process, then coke removal is faster, but catalyst damage increases and catalyst life decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveregeneration speedVSAvoidcatalyst life
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The first combustion zone performs preliminary coke removal under controlled, lower oxygen conditions before the catalyst enters the second combustion zone. This preliminary action removes the most reactive and easily combustible coke components, preparing the catalyst for the more intense combustion in the second zone while minimizing overall catalyst exposure to harsh conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The oxygen concentration parameter is varied spatially through the regenerator, with the first combustion zone operating at lower oxygen concentrations (e.g., 0.5-2%) and the second combustion zone operating at higher oxygen concentrations (e.g., 2-5%). This parameter change allows optimization of combustion rate at each stage while protecting catalyst integrity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If multiple combustion zones with varying oxygen concentrations are implemented, then coke removal efficiency improves and catalyst life extends, but equipment complexity and operational difficulty increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecatalyst lifeVSAvoidprocess control difficulty
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

Multiple combustion zones are combined within a single regenerator vessel, integrating the functions of different oxygen concentration environments into one unified piece of equipment. This merging approach achieves the benefits of staged combustion while avoiding the operational complexity of multiple separate regenerators, as all zones operate simultaneously within the same equipment footprint.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

4Productivity

If conventional single-zone regeneration is used, then equipment size is smaller, but processing capacity and regeneration robustness are limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing capacityVSAvoidregenerator size
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSVolume of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The regenerator design incorporates vertical zoning with the first combustion zone positioned above the second combustion zone, utilizing the vertical dimension to create distinct combustion environments. This dimensional arrangement allows multiple combustion stages to occur simultaneously in different vertical levels, increasing processing capacity without requiring proportional increases in horizontal equipment footprint.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enhances coke removal efficiency, extends catalyst life, and allows for more robust regeneration cycles, reducing equipment size or increasing processing capacity within existing equipment.

Implementation Method 1

The catalyst is treated at a first set of combustion conditions with a first regeneration gas, within the first stage, and thereby generating an intermediate catalyst stream

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCombustion: Combustion

Implementation Method 2

The intermediate catalyst stream is passed to a second stage in the regenerator, where the catalyst is treated at a second set of combustion conditions with a first portion of a second regeneration gas

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCombustion: Combustion

Implementation Method 3

halogenation to redistribute catalytic metals

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHalogenation:

Data Source

PatentUS8895464B2Robustness of coke burning from catalyst for light paraffin dehydrogenation process
Publication Date: 2014.11.25 UOP LLC
  • US8895464B2 patent drawing
  • US8895464B2 patent drawing
  • US8895464B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A process for a continuous regeneration of a catalyst wherein the regeneration section includes at least two separate zones. The regeneration includes an upper combustion zone, and an lower combustion zone, where the process utilizes at least two independent regeneration gas loops for control of the amount of oxygen to regenerate the catalyst. The upper combustion zone can be divided into multiple zones, and the combustion zone can be divided into multiple zones.