Multi-sub-band LBT Operation for 5G Spectrum Access

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current wireless communication systems face inefficiencies in accessing shared radio frequency spectra with multiple sub-bands, particularly in 5G networks where each carrier includes multiple sub-bands, as existing techniques from LTE networks are not applicable, leading to fairness and accessibility issues.

Innovation Solution

A method for wireless communication at a UE that involves identifying multiple carriers and sub-bands, performing category 4 LBT procedures on selected sub-bands within carriers, and conducting category 2 LBT procedures on remaining sub-bands across different carriers to efficiently contend for access while ensuring fairness and accessibility in the shared radio frequency spectrum.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If LTE-based LBT techniques are applied to 5G networks with multiple sub-bands per carrier, then existing system compatibility is maintained, but fairness and accessibility issues arise in shared spectrum access

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to existing LTE systemsVSAvoidfairness and accessibility in spectrum access
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the LBT procedure into two distinct types: Type 1 LBT for the first sub-band and Type 2 LBT for subsequent sub-bands. This segmentation allows the system to handle the first sub-band with a more comprehensive channel access procedure while using a simplified procedure for additional sub-bands, thereby improving fairness and accessibility in 5G networks while maintaining compatibility with existing LTE systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces dynamic selection of LBT types based on sub-band index and configuration. The UE dynamically determines whether to perform Type 1 or Type 2 LBT procedures based on the specific sub-band being accessed and network configuration, allowing adaptive behavior that improves spectrum access fairness while maintaining system versatility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Reliability

If LBT procedures are performed on all sub-bands within a carrier, then complete channel access is achieved, but access probability decreases and latency increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomplete channel accessVSAvoidaccess probability and latency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the comprehensive Type 1 LBT procedure and applies it only to the first sub-band, while subsequent sub-bands use the simplified Type 2 LBT procedure. This extraction approach maintains complete channel access reliability for the primary sub-band while improving access probability and reducing latency for additional sub-bands by avoiding redundant comprehensive checks.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies partial action by performing the full Type 1 LBT procedure only once for the first sub-band, and then using the lighter Type 2 procedure for remaining sub-bands. This partial application of the comprehensive procedure maintains necessary reliability while improving overall productivity in terms of access probability and latency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Reliability

If Type 1 LBT is performed on every sub-band, then channel access reliability is maximized, but system complexity and overhead increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvechannel access reliabilityVSAvoidLBT procedure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the LBT procedure application by assigning Type 1 LBT to the first sub-band and Type 2 LBT to subsequent sub-bands. This segmentation maintains high channel access reliability for the primary sub-band while reducing device complexity and overhead for additional sub-bands by using the simplified procedure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies local quality by using different LBT procedure types for different sub-bands based on their roles. The first sub-band receives the more reliable Type 1 procedure, while subsequent sub-bands use the lighter Type 2 procedure, optimizing the balance between reliability and complexity locally for each sub-band.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS11375542B2Multi-sub-band LBT operation
Publication Date: 2022.06.28 QUALCOMM INC
  • US11375542B2 patent drawing
  • US11375542B2 patent drawing
  • US11375542B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The described techniques provide for efficiently contending for access to a shared radio frequency spectrum for communicating on multiple allocated sub-bands across multiple carriers. As described herein, a user equipment (UE) may first identify allocated sub-bands across multiple carriers in a shared radio frequency spectrum. The UE may then select a carrier and at least one of the multiple allocated sub-bands within the carrier on which to perform a listen-before-talk (LBT) procedure of a first type, and the UE may perform the LBT procedure of the first type on the at least one sub-band. In addition, the UE may also perform LBT procedures of a second type on allocated sub-bands within carriers different from the selected carrier. Based on the results of the LBT procedures, the UE may communicate with the base station on the allocated sub-bands across the multiple carriers in the shared radio frequency spectrum.