Passive Multibeam Satellite Coverage Reallocation After Spot Failure

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current satellite communication systems face performance limitations due to the need for redundant RF chains in passive antenna solutions, which increase complexity, weight, and RF losses, while active antenna systems lack directivity and resource re-use capabilities.

Innovation Solution

A multibeam satellite radiocommunications system with a resource allocator that forms a regular network of satellite spots using passive multibeam antennas, allocating unique spectral resources to each spot and extending coverage in case of failures without redundant circuits, allowing adjacent spots to cover failing areas and reallocate resources.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If passive antenna systems with redundant RF chains are used, then reliability is improved through redundancy circuits, but device complexity and payload weight increase

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovereliabilityVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and removes the redundancy circuits from the passive antenna system, keeping only the essential RF chains. This eliminates the complex switching networks and redundancy management hardware while maintaining reliability through the alternative approach of using multiple radiating feeds per beam without redundant amplification paths.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of using redundant RF chains with switching networks to achieve reliability, the patent inverts the approach by using a single RF chain that feeds multiple radiating elements, where the focal network provides the redundancy path. The failure mode is inverted from RF chain failure to beam formation failure, which is less critical.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

2Reliability

If passive antenna systems with redundant RF chains are used, then reliability is improved, but payload weight increases due to redundancy circuits

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovereliabilityVSAvoidpayload weight
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSWeight of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent removes the heavy redundancy circuits including electromechanical or ferrite switches and associated control hardware from the payload. The weight reduction comes from eliminating these components while maintaining reliability through the simplified architecture of multiple feeds per beam without redundant amplification paths.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

3Device complexity

If active antenna systems are used to eliminate redundant circuits, then device complexity is reduced, but directivity and resource re-use capability deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice complexityVSAvoiddirectivity
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by assigning different functions to different parts of the antenna system. Each radiating feed is optimized for its specific beam formation role, with precise phase and amplitude control at each feed element. This local optimization maintains high directivity while using a simpler overall architecture without redundant circuits.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the operational parameters of the radiating feeds, controlling phase and amplitude independently at each feed element to achieve precise beam forming. This parameter control enables high directivity performance while using a non-redundant architecture, as the beam shape and direction are controlled through parameter adjustment rather than hardware redundancy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Reliability

If passive antenna systems with redundant RF chains are used, then reliability is improved, but RF losses increase due to redundancy circuits

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovereliabilityVSAvoidRF losses
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and removes the redundancy circuits that cause RF losses, including the switching networks and additional connection paths. By eliminating these components, the RF signal path is shortened and simplified, reducing ohmic losses and improving overall system efficiency while maintaining reliability through the alternative beam formation approach.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Data Source

PatentUS20240014887A1Non-redundant passive multibeam satellite radio-communications system
Publication Date: 2024.01.11 THALES SA
  • US20240014887A1 patent drawing
  • US20240014887A1 patent drawing
  • US20240014887A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A multibeam satellite radiocommunications system includes at least one satellite having at least one passive multibeam antenna system, at least one satellite terminal, a resource allocator configured to form a regular network of satellite spots arranged according to a mesh in quadrilateral form over a given geographic zone, to associate spectral resources with the satellite spots, then to allocate spectral resources to the satellite terminals as a function of their position, wherein the resource allocator is configured to, in the event of failure of a satellite spot, extend the zone of coverage of the satellite spots adjacent to the failing satellite spot so as to cover the surface that it occupies, and allocate new spectral resources to the satellite terminals of the failing satellite spot as a function of their position. A resource allocator and the corresponding method are also provided.