Multi-Branch Endoprosthesis With Single Side Portal Access
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
Existing implantable endoluminal devices face challenges in managing guidewire entanglement, cannulation of branch vessels, device manufacturing complexity, positioning difficulties, and excessive profile when accessing multiple side-branch vessels.
Innovation Solution
An implantable endoluminal device with a main endoprosthesis featuring a single side portal and side portal adaptor with grooves allows deployment of multiple side-branch endoprostheses through a single channel, facilitating guidewire manipulation and reducing entanglement, while enabling easy cannulation and simplified deployment.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Adaptability or versatility
If multiple side portals are provided in the main endoprosthesis to access multiple side-branch vessels, then access to branch vessels is improved, but device complexity and guidewire entanglement increase
Solution Approach 1:
The patent merges multiple side portal functions into a single side portal structure. The main endoprosthesis includes one side portal that accommodates multiple side-branch endoprostheses through a shared side channel, eliminating the need for multiple separate side portals and reducing guidewire entanglement while maintaining access to multiple branch vessels.
Solution Approach 2:
The single side portal is designed with universal functionality to accommodate multiple different side-branch endoprostheses. The side channel and adaptor structure can receive and support multiple side-branch devices simultaneously, making the single portal as effective as multiple portals would be for accessing different branch vessels.
2Adaptability or versatility
If multiple side portals are used to access multiple side-branch vessels, then branch vessel access is improved, but cannulation difficulty increases
Solution Approach 1:
The patent combines multiple cannulation targets into a single side portal entry point. Operators need to cannulate only one side portal rather than multiple separate portals, significantly simplifying the cannulation procedure while still enabling access to multiple side-branch vessels through the shared side channel.
3Adaptability or versatility
If multiple separate side portals are provided, then access to multiple branch vessels is achieved, but manufacturing complexity increases
Solution Approach 1:
The patent merges multiple side portal structures into a single integrated side portal with a shared side channel. This consolidation reduces the number of separate components that need to be manufactured and assembled, simplifying the manufacturing process while maintaining the capability to access multiple side-branch vessels.
4Adaptability or versatility
If multiple side-branch endoprostheses are deployed through separate portals, then branch vessel coverage is improved, but device profile increases
Solution Approach 1:
The patent employs a nested configuration where multiple side-branch endoprostheses are deployed through a single side portal and share a common side channel. This nesting approach allows multiple devices to occupy a more compact spatial arrangement, reducing the overall device profile compared to having separate portals for each side-branch device.
Data Source
Figure 1~3
Figure 4~5
Figure 6~7
AI summary
An implantable device comprising a main endoprosthesis configured for implantation in a vessel, the main endoprosthesis including at least one side portal, a first side-branch endoprosthesis configured to be deployed within the main endoprosthesis and direct flow through a first side-branch vessel via the at least one side portal, a second side-branch endoprosthesis configured to be deployed within the main endoprosthesis and direct flow through a second branch vessel via the at least one side portal, and wherein when not containing a side-branch endoprosthesis the at least one side portal comprises a side channel without fluid separation.