Multi-Bridge Transistor Silicide Stress for Short-Channel Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current semiconductor devices face challenges in improving performance and reducing short channel effects in multi-gate transistors, particularly in scaling and current control, due to limitations in gate length and channel design.

Innovation Solution

The semiconductor device incorporates a substrate with alternating regions of p-type and n-type field effect transistors, featuring bridge patterns and epitaxial patterns with silicide patterns that apply different stress properties, enhancing carrier mobility and channel resistance through epitaxial trenches and silicide filling.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If multi-gate transistor scaling is performed to increase integration density, then device density improves, but short channel effects worsen

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveintegration densityVSAvoidshort channel effect suppression
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transitions from planar 2D channel structures to three-dimensional multi-bridge channel structures. Multiple bridge channels are stacked vertically and penetrate the gate structure, creating a 3D configuration that enhances gate control over the channel region while maintaining scaled dimensions, thereby improving density without sacrificing short channel effect suppression

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The channel region is divided into multiple discrete bridge channels that are spaced apart from each other. These segmented channels allow the gate to control current flow through multiple pathways, improving both density and control capability while mitigating short channel effects through the distributed channel architecture

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Reliability

If gate length is increased to improve current control capability, then current control improves, but device scaling is restricted

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecurrent control capabilityVSAvoidgate length
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLength of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The invention moves from single-plane gate control to multi-layer gate structures that wrap around and control multiple bridge channels in three dimensions. This vertical stacking of gates provides enhanced control capability without requiring increased horizontal gate length, enabling continued scaling

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

Multiple gate structures are nested around the bridge channels in a layered configuration, with each gate controlling specific channels. This nested arrangement maximizes control capability within compact dimensions, allowing improved current control without proportionally increasing overall device footprint

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

3Reliability

If bridge patterns are stacked to form multi-bridge channels, then channel control capability improves, but manufacturing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvechannel control capabilityVSAvoidmulti-bridge channel structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The gate structure serves multiple functions simultaneously: it controls current flow through multiple bridge channels, provides electrical isolation between channels, and acts as a framework for the overall device architecture. This multi-functionality reduces the need for additional separate components, managing complexity while maintaining control capability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This design improves channel resistance and contact resistance, leading to enhanced performance and reduced short channel effects, allowing for more efficient scaling and current control in multi-gate transistors.

Implementation Method 1

the first silicide pattern and the second silicide pattern have stress properties different from each other

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectStress: Stress Relaxation

Data Source

PatentUS20240339498A1Semiconductor device and method for fabricating the same
Publication Date: 2024.10.10 SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO LTD
  • US20240339498A1 patent drawing
  • US20240339498A1 patent drawing
  • US20240339498A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A semiconductor device may include a first epitaxial pattern connected to first bridge patterns sequentially stacked on a first region and penetrating through a first gate structure, the first epitaxial layer on a side of the first gate structure and including a first conductivity type impurity, a first silicide pattern on the first epitaxial pattern and overlapping the first bridge patterns in the first direction, a second epitaxial pattern connected to second bridge patterns sequentially stacked on a second region and penetrating through a second gate structure, the second epitaxial layer on a side of the second gate structure and including a second conductivity type impurity different from the first conductivity type impurity, and a second silicide pattern on the second epitaxial pattern and overlapping the second bridge patterns in the third direction, wherein the first silicide pattern and the second silicide pattern have stress properties different from each other.