Multi-Camera Compliance Monitoring with Dynamic Field Adjustment

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing compliance monitoring systems face challenges in coordinating among multiple devices in real-time to automatically identify and report compliance rule violations, particularly due to limitations in data collection from multiple aspects of a compliance-based interaction using a single camera.

Innovation Solution

A system utilizing multiple cameras with movable fields of view, sensors associated with secure objects, and user devices to detect trigger events, adjust camera views, capture video data, and analyze information in real-time to identify compliance rule violations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If a single camera is used for compliance monitoring, then device complexity is reduced, but measurement precision and data collection capability deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecamera system complexityVSAvoidcompliance violation detection accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system divides the monitoring task among multiple cameras, each responsible for capturing specific aspects of compliance interactions from different angles. This segmentation allows comprehensive data collection while maintaining manageable complexity through modular camera units that can be independently configured and positioned.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transitions from a single-camera two-dimensional view to a multi-camera three-dimensional monitoring system. By adding spatial dimensions through multiple camera positions and angles, the system achieves comprehensive coverage of compliance interactions, enabling precise detection of violations that would be invisible from a single viewpoint.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Measurement precision

If multiple cameras with movable fields of view are used, then measurement precision and data collection improve, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompliance violation detection accuracyVSAvoidcamera system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system employs cameras with movable fields of view that can dynamically adjust their orientation and positioning based on detected trigger events. This dynamic capability allows the cameras to automatically optimize their viewing angles and focus on relevant compliance interactions, improving measurement precision while the automated control reduces operational complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback mechanisms where camera positioning and field of view adjustments are automatically controlled based on feedback from trigger event detections. This closed-loop control enables the cameras to respond adaptively to compliance events, improving detection accuracy while reducing manual intervention and operational complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Productivity

If real-time coordination among multiple devices is implemented, then productivity and response time improve, but device complexity and processing requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompliance monitoring efficiencyVSAvoidsystem coordination complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system merges the functionality of multiple cameras, sensors, and user devices into a unified compliance monitoring system with centralized coordination. This integration enables real-time data sharing and coordinated operation among all devices, improving productivity through synchronized monitoring while the centralized architecture manages complexity through unified control logic.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The system employs multi-functional devices that can perform multiple roles within the compliance monitoring ecosystem. User devices serve both as interaction interfaces and as data collection points, while cameras function both as security monitors and compliance sensors. This universality reduces the total number of specialized components needed, thereby reducing overall system complexity while maintaining high productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS12272144B2Computer vision-assisted compliance monitoring
Publication Date: 2025.04.08 CAPITAL ONE SERVICES LLC
  • US12272144B2 patent drawing
  • US12272144B2 patent drawing
  • US12272144B2 patent drawing

AI summary

In some implementations, a compliance monitoring device may detect a trigger event associated with a compliance-based interaction. The compliance-based interaction may be associated with a secure location, a user device of a user, a sensor associated with a secure object, and one or more cameras. The compliance monitoring device may cause the one or more cameras to capture a set of images associated with the compliance-based interaction. The compliance monitoring device may receive the images and may extract image information from the set of images. The compliance monitoring device may receive positioning information associated with the user device and status information associated with the secure object. The compliance monitoring device may analyze at least one of the image information, the positioning information, or the status information to identify a compliance rule violation. The compliance monitoring device may provide an alert indication based on identifying the compliance rule violation.