Multi-Camera Object Tracking via 3D Spatial Correlation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current video monitoring systems face challenges in correlating and tracking objects across multiple cameras with different fields of view, leading to inefficiencies and inaccuracies in security and surveillance applications.

Innovation Solution

A system that analyzes video content from multiple cameras with overlapping or disjoint fields of view, using feature vectors and real-world constraints to correlate objects, track them across views, and selectively activate/deactivate cameras based on object presence, thereby improving accuracy and energy efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Area of stationary object

If video monitoring systems use multiple cameras with different fields of view to monitor environments, then coverage area increases, but object correlation accuracy deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemonitoring coverage areaVSAvoidobject correlation accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system introduces intermediate reference objects (such as static landmarks or calibration targets) that appear in multiple camera fields of view. These intermediaries serve as mediators to establish spatial relationships between cameras, enabling accurate correlation of moving objects across different views by providing a common reference framework that bridges the gap between disparate camera perspectives.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system transitions from two-dimensional image plane correlation to three-dimensional spatial correlation by incorporating depth information and camera pose data. By lifting the correlation problem into 3D space, the system can accurately match objects across cameras with different fields of view by comparing their positions in a unified 3D coordinate system rather than attempting direct 2D image matching.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Reliability

If the system continuously records and analyzes video feeds from all cameras, then object tracking reliability improves, but energy consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveobject tracking reliabilityVSAvoidsystem energy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements periodic sampling and event-triggered recording instead of continuous recording. Video analysis is performed at specific intervals or only when motion events are detected, allowing the system to maintain reliable object tracking capability while significantly reducing energy consumption by keeping cameras and processing units in low-power states during idle periods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The system extracts and processes only relevant video segments containing detected objects or events, rather than continuously analyzing all video feeds. By extracting only the necessary portions of video data for analysis and discarding redundant continuous recording, the system maintains tracking reliability for objects of interest while reducing overall energy consumption from continuous full-scene monitoring.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

3Quantity of substance

If the system processes video content from all cameras simultaneously, then object detection completeness improves, but computational complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveobject detection completenessVSAvoidcomputational complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system divides the video processing task into segments by allocating different cameras or camera groups to separate processing units or time slots. This segmentation allows the system to maintain complete object detection across all cameras by distributing the computational load, preventing any single processor from becoming overwhelmed while ensuring all camera feeds are analyzed for object presence.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary processing on video content from all cameras, such as detecting candidate objects, estimating their positions, and predicting their trajectories before conducting detailed correlation analysis. This preliminary action filters out false detections and pre-identifies potential object matches, reducing the computational complexity of the subsequent correlation processing while maintaining complete object detection coverage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS10592771B2Multi-camera object tracking
Publication Date: 2020.03.17 ACCENTURE GLOBAL SOLUTIONS LTD
  • US10592771B2 patent drawing
  • US10592771B2 patent drawing
  • US10592771B2 patent drawing

AI summary

This document describes systems, methods, devices, and other techniques for accessing a first video showing a first two-dimensional scene of an environment and captured by a first camera located in the environment having a first field of view; detecting one or more objects shown in the first video; analyzing the first video to determine one or more features of each of the detected objects shown in the first video; accessing a second video showing a second 2D scene of the environment and captured by a second camera located in the environment having a second field of view; detecting one or more objects shown in the second video; analyzing the second video to determine one or more features of each of the detected objects shown in the second video; and correlating one or more objects shown in the first video with one or more objects shown in the second video.