Multi-Camera Vision System Object Classification

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current vision systems for monitoring vehicle surroundings, especially in the automotive market, face challenges due to high costs, power consumption, and complexity in rapidly processing large amounts of data from multiple sensors to provide real-time situational awareness, which is crucial for safety and security applications.

Innovation Solution

A multi-camera vision processing system with a central control unit that classifies objects using multiple cameras with varying field of view angles and focal distances, allowing for efficient object detection and classification by limiting scan window sizes based on object distance, thereby reducing computational load and enhancing processing speed.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Area of stationary object

If multiple cameras with varying field of view angles and focal distances are used to provide comprehensive situational awareness, then the coverage area and detection capability are improved, but the device complexity and processing cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecoverage areaVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system divides the monitoring area into multiple zones with different detection requirements. Cameras are strategically positioned and configured with different field of view angles to cover specific zones, allowing comprehensive coverage while managing complexity through functional segmentation of the monitoring space.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different cameras are configured with different field of view angles and focal distances optimized for their specific monitoring zones. This allows each camera to have local quality tailored to its function, with wide-angle cameras for peripheral zones and telephoto cameras for distant critical areas, improving overall system efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Speed

If large amounts of data from multiple cameras are processed rapidly for real-time responses, then the response time and safety monitoring capability are improved, but the power consumption and processing cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing speedVSAvoidpower consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary classification of detected objects into categories (vehicle, pedestrian, animal, unknown) before full analysis. This preliminary action allows the system to prioritize processing of critical objects while reducing detailed analysis of less important detections, thereby reducing overall power consumption while maintaining real-time response capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies full processing power selectively to objects that require immediate attention (such as classified vehicles or unknown objects near the vehicle), while using reduced processing for other detected objects. This partial action approach maintains safety-critical response times while reducing unnecessary power consumption on non-critical data.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Productivity

If scan window sizes are limited based on object distance to reduce computational load, then the processing efficiency is improved, but the measurement precision may be affected

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing efficiencyVSAvoidobject classification precision
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The scan window size is dynamically adjusted based on the detected object's distance from the vehicle. For distant objects, larger scan windows are used to capture sufficient detail for accurate classification, while for closer objects, appropriately sized windows maintain precision without excessive processing. This dynamic adaptation resolves the contradiction between processing efficiency and measurement precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the scan window parameter based on object distance and classification requirements. By adjusting this critical parameter dynamically, the system optimizes the balance between processing efficiency (smaller windows process faster) and measurement precision (larger windows provide more data for accurate classification), achieving both goals under different operating conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS11301698B2Multi-camera vision system and method of monitoring
Publication Date: 2022.04.12 TOBII TECHNOLOGIES LTD
  • US11301698B2 patent drawing
  • US11301698B2 patent drawing
  • US11301698B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A multi-camera vision system and method of monitoring. In one embodiment imaging systems provide object classifications with cameras positioned to receive image data from a field of view to classify an object among multiple classifications. A control unit receives classification or position information of objects and (ii) displays an image corresponding to a classified object relative to the position of the structure. An embodiment of a related method monitors positions of an imaged object about a boundary by continually capturing at least first and second series of image frames, each series comprising different fields of view of a scene about the boundary, with some of the image frames in the first series covering a wide angle field of view and some of the image frames in the second series covering no more than a narrow angle field of view.