Multicast Network Event Correlation for Automated Failure Analysis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The complexity of multicast network configurations and the need for automated management and failure analysis pose challenges in ensuring network operation and responsiveness, as manual configuration and physical node failures can lead to partial or complete network failures.

Innovation Solution

A method and apparatus for modeling multicast protocol entities and their relationships, using a framework that represents components, their interactions, and observable events, allowing for automated discovery, impact analysis, and root-cause analysis of issues within the network.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If manual configuration and management of multicast network components is used, then configuration flexibility and adaptability are maintained, but the complexity of management increases and the risk of configuration errors leading to network failures increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenetwork operation reliabilityVSAvoidmanagement complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables automated self-configuration and self-management of multicast network components through event correlation and automatic discovery mechanisms. The network components automatically report their state and configuration, eliminating the need for manual configuration while maintaining reliability through automated monitoring and failure detection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements continuous feedback loops where network components monitor their own operational state and automatically report events to a central management system. This feedback mechanism enables automatic detection of configuration errors and network failures, allowing the system to maintain reliability through automated responses without increasing management complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If physical node failures occur in multicast network, then network robustness is tested, but complete or partial network failures result requiring manual intervention

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenetwork responsivenessVSAvoidfailure recovery ease
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by continuously monitoring and correlating events from multiple network components before actual failures occur. The automated discovery and event correlation mechanisms detect potential issues early, enabling preventive maintenance and automatic failover before complete network failures happen, thus improving ease of operation during failure recovery.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary event correlation system that mediates between physical network components and the management interface. This intermediary automatically correlates events from multiple sources, identifies failure patterns, and coordinates recovery actions, eliminating the need for manual intervention during failure recovery while maintaining network responsiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Productivity

If automated discovery and event correlation systems are implemented, then management efficiency and failure analysis capability improve, but system complexity and resource consumption increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanagement efficiencyVSAvoidsystem architecture complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The event correlation system is designed as a universal platform that handles multiple functions including automated discovery, event monitoring, correlation analysis, and failure diagnosis through a single integrated architecture. This multi-functionality improves management efficiency without proportionally increasing system complexity, as the same core mechanisms serve multiple purposes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent segments the automated discovery and event correlation system into modular components that can be independently deployed and scaled. Each module handles specific aspects of network monitoring and analysis, allowing the system to achieve high management efficiency while keeping individual component complexity manageable through clear separation of concerns.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS7912055B1Method and apparatus for configuration and analysis of network multicast routing protocols
Publication Date: 2011.03.22 EMC IP HLDG CO LLC
  • US7912055B1 patent drawing
  • US7912055B1 patent drawing
  • US7912055B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method and apparatus for operating on a system containing a plurality of components in communication using multicast communication protocol is disclosed. The method comprises the steps of representing selected ones of the plurality of components, the relationship among the components and the associated with the communication protocols, determining a mapping between a plurality of events and a plurality of observable events occurring among the components and among the communication protocols, wherein the mapping is represented as a value associating each event with each observable event, and performing the system operation in conjunction with the relationship between the events and observable events. The operations may be selected from the group of monitoring, discovering, managing, analyzing and displaying the components associated with the multicast protocols.