Multicast Feedback Mirroring to Reduce Signaling Overhead

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Multicast data transmission in point-to-multipoint systems faces inefficiencies due to excessive feedback signaling, particularly when retransmissions are needed, as each recipient must send separate feedback messages, leading to significant channel capacity usage and interference, especially in large recipient groups.

Innovation Solution

A method where a transmitting station receives confirmation messages from one receiving station and mirrors them to others, allowing informed decision-making without individual feedback from all stations, and initiates retransmissions upon receiving a negative acknowledgement, reducing unnecessary signaling and channel usage.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If each recipient sends separate feedback messages to the transmitting station, then the transmitting station can determine which recipients need retransmissions, but the feedback signaling amount increases significantly and occupies channel capacity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveretransmission accuracyVSAvoidfeedback signaling amount
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines multiple individual feedback messages from recipients into a single collective feedback message. Instead of each recipient sending separate acknowledgments, the system merges these feedback signals to indicate whether any recipient needs retransmission, thereby reducing the overall feedback signaling amount while maintaining retransmission reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The transmitting station sends a copy of the collective feedback message to all recipients. This allows each recipient to learn whether retransmission is needed without each recipient individually signaling the transmitting station, thus reducing feedback overhead while ensuring all recipients have the necessary information.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

2Reliability

If retransmission is performed when at least one recipient requests it, then all recipients can receive the retransmitted data, but another point-to-multipoint transmission is required occupying channel capacity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata delivery reliabilityVSAvoidchannel capacity efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges the retransmission operation into a single point-to-multipoint transmission event. When any recipient needs retransmission, the system performs one collective retransmission to all recipients simultaneously, rather than individual point-to-point retransmissions, thereby improving channel capacity efficiency while maintaining data delivery reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Reliability

If confirmation messages from multiple recipients are collected and processed, then the transmitting station can make informed retransmission decisions, but the processing time and complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveretransmission decision accuracyVSAvoidfeedback processing time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts only the essential information from recipient feedback - specifically, whether any recipient needs retransmission - without processing detailed individual feedback from each recipient. This extraction approach maintains retransmission decision accuracy while significantly reducing processing time and complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs partial feedback processing by focusing only on the critical aspect of feedback (whether retransmission is needed) rather than fully processing all individual recipient feedback messages. This partial action approach reduces processing overhead while maintaining sufficient decision accuracy for retransmission operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS9775005B2Feedback signalling for multicast data transmission
Publication Date: 2017.09.26 KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS NV
  • US9775005B2 patent drawing
  • US9775005B2 patent drawing
  • US9775005B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Data transmission in a multicast fashion in which retransmissions are requested by recipients sending feedback to the one sender. Receiving stations are informed about the feedback of another receiving station. This is done by mirroring the feedback of receiving stations to other receiving stations. Due to this, in case, for example, one of the mirrored feedbacks is a negative acknowledgement message, the other receiving stations are informed that it is no longer necessary to provide their feedback, since a retransmission will be initiated anyway. Advantageously, this may allow reduced interference in the direction of the feedback.