Multicast Feedback Mechanism for V2X Retransmission Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In wireless communication systems, particularly in peer-to-peer (D2D) communications like V2X, ensuring quality of service (QoS) without overusing resources is challenging due to concurrent transmissions that prevent devices from receiving and providing feedback, leading to unnecessary retransmissions and resource wastage.

Innovation Solution

A feedback-based retransmission mechanism where nearby devices detect and provide feedback to the transmitting device when another device is unable to receive a transmission, allowing retransmissions only when feedback is received, thereby avoiding blind retransmissions and conserving resources.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If blind retransmissions are performed without feedback, then reliability of multicast communications is improved, but resource consumption increases and power is wasted

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereliability of multicast communicationsVSAvoidpower consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a feedback mechanism where receiving UEs send acknowledgments to transmitting UEs about successful packet reception. This feedback allows the transmitting UE to determine whether retransmissions are necessary, eliminating blind retransmissions and reducing power consumption while maintaining communication reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If retransmissions are performed without feedback, then packet reception reliability is improved, but system resources are wasted

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepacket reception reliabilityVSAvoidsystem resources
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs feedback from receiving UEs to inform transmitting UEs about successful packet reception. This enables the system to perform retransmissions only when necessary, optimizing resource utilization while ensuring reliable packet delivery.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Measurement precision

If feedback is transmitted by receiving devices, then retransmission accuracy is improved, but device complexity increases due to half-duplex constraints

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveretransmission accuracyVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent schedules feedback transmission in advance within predetermined time windows that are coordinated with the transmission timeline. This preliminary scheduling of feedback opportunities simplifies the half-duplex operation by providing clear temporal guidelines for when devices should transmit or receive, reducing the complexity of real-time decision-making.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Loss of energy

If feedback mechanism is implemented, then unnecessary retransmissions are reduced, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy efficiencyVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent pre-configures feedback time windows and transmission schedules, allowing devices to operate with simplified logic based on predetermined timing rather than complex real-time negotiations. This reduces the operational complexity while maintaining energy efficiency through targeted feedback.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

5Reliability

If blind retransmissions are performed, then communication reliability is improved, but interference to other transmissions increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecommunication reliabilityVSAvoidinterference
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses feedback from receiving UEs to determine whether retransmissions are actually needed. By transmitting feedback only when packets are successfully received or when retransmission is necessary, the system reduces unnecessary transmissions that would cause interference to other communications while maintaining reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS11330565B2Feedback for multicast peer-to-peer communications
Publication Date: 2022.05.10 QUALCOMM INC
  • US11330565B2 patent drawing
  • US11330565B2 patent drawing
  • US11330565B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Aspects of the present disclosure propose a mechanism whereby a nearby device may detect scenarios where one device is unable to receive communications from a transmitting device. For example, the nearby device may detect that concurrent transmissions of a transmitting device and intended recipient prevent reception by the intended recipient and provide feedback to the transmitting device. Rather than blindly retransmitting, the transmitting device may only retransmit when it receives feedback from the nearby device, saving power and avoiding unnecessary transmissions.