Multicast Transmission Parameter Adjustment for QoS Differentiation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current Multimedia Broadcast Multicast Service (MBMS) and evolved MBMS (eMBMS) technologies face challenges in ensuring reliable and efficient transmission of multicast content data due to feedback implosion issues, constant overhead from application layer forward error correction, and lack of quality of service (QoS) differentiation, particularly in scenarios with diverse wireless device conditions.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a system and method that adjusts transmission parameters based on feedback from wireless devices, allowing for differentiated quality of service levels by varying content bit rates, coding rates, and modulation and coding schemes, enabling adaptive transmission schemes to improve reliability and efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If application layer forward error correction is used to increase transmission reliability, then reliability is improved, but device complexity and computational overhead increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransmission reliabilityVSAvoidcomputational overhead
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements feedback mechanisms where receiving devices report channel quality and decoding status to transmitting devices. Based on this feedback, the system dynamically adjusts transmission parameters including whether to apply forward error correction, thereby optimizing the balance between reliability and computational overhead for different channel conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces dynamic adaptation of transmission parameters including forward error correction application based on real-time channel conditions. The system transitions from static to dynamic parameter selection, allowing forward error correction to be applied selectively rather than uniformly, reducing computational overhead when channel conditions permit.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Reliability

If fixed content bit rates and coding rates are used to ensure service for devices in worst channel conditions, then reliability is improved, but productivity decreases due to over-provisioning

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveservice reliabilityVSAvoidresource utilization efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies different transmission quality levels to different receiving devices based on their individual channel conditions. Devices in poor channel conditions receive transmissions with higher redundancy and error correction, while devices in good channel conditions receive transmissions with lower overhead, optimizing overall resource utilization while maintaining service reliability for all users.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements dynamic parameter adjustment where content bit rates and coding rates are modified based on channel conditions and device capabilities. The system transitions from fixed parameters optimized for worst-case scenarios to adaptive parameters that match actual channel conditions, improving resource utilization efficiency while maintaining service reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Productivity

If multicast transmission is used to efficiently deliver content to multiple devices, then productivity is improved, but reliability worsens due to feedback implosion and lack of QoS differentiation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransmission efficiencyVSAvoidcontent delivery reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts transmission parameters including modulation schemes, coding rates, and resource allocation based on channel conditions and QoS requirements. This allows multicast transmissions to adapt to varying channel conditions across different devices, improving reliability while maintaining the efficiency benefits of multicast delivery.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements feedback mechanisms where receiving devices report channel quality and decoding status to transmitting devices. This feedback enables the system to adjust transmission parameters and retransmit data selectively, improving content delivery reliability in multicast scenarios without causing feedback implosion through intelligent feedback management.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

4Productivity

If differentiated QoS levels are implemented to serve premium users, then productivity increases through better resource utilization, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresource utilizationVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements differentiated QoS by applying different transmission quality levels to different receiving devices based on their service subscriptions and channel conditions. Premium users receive transmissions optimized for higher quality with appropriate error correction and modulation schemes, while standard users receive transmissions optimized for their specific requirements, improving overall resource utilization through localized quality adjustment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS10015218B2System and method for adjusting transmission parameters of multicast content data
Publication Date: 2018.07.03 GUANGDONG OPPO MOBILE TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORP LTD
  • US10015218B2 patent drawing
  • US10015218B2 patent drawing
  • US10015218B2 patent drawing

AI summary

According to certain embodiments, methods and systems for providing broadcast multicast service include transmitting, by a network node, a first transmission of multicast content data to wireless devices at a first quality of service level and a second transmission of multicast content data to the wireless devices at a second quality of service level. The second quality of service level may be of a higher quality of service than the first quality of service. Feedback may be received from at least one wireless device in the broadcast service area. In response to the feedback from the wireless devices, one or more transmission parameters associated with a subsequent transmission of the multicast content data may be adjusted.