Multi-Cell Cyclone Separator Layout to Prevent Particle Clogging

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In multi-cell cyclone separators, particle accumulations can lead to clogging and a decrease in separation efficiency, particularly in horizontally arranged multi-cyclones, as existing technologies struggle to effectively discharge particles from multiple cyclone cells.

Innovation Solution

The cyclone separator is designed with at least three cyclone cells, including counter-rotating cells that cause fluid rotation in opposite directions, with strategically arranged particle exit openings and outlets to prevent accumulation, allowing particles to be discharged efficiently and reducing the risk of clogging.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If multiple cyclone cells are arranged adjacent and above each other to increase separation capacity, then the quantity of particles separated increases, but particle accumulations occur leading to clogging and reduced separation efficiency

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveseparation capacityVSAvoidseparation efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The cyclone separator is divided into multiple cyclone cells (at least three) arranged in a multi-cell configuration, allowing parallel processing of fluid streams to increase overall separation capacity while maintaining individual cell performance

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs both right-handed and left-handed cyclone cells in an asymmetric arrangement. This asymmetry prevents particle accumulation by ensuring that particles from different cells exit in different directions, avoiding convergence and clogging at the particle outlet

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

2Reliability

If only two cyclone cells are provided with opposite rotation directions to prevent particle accumulation, then the risk of clogging is reduced, but the separation capacity is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveparticle discharge efficiencyVSAvoidseparation capacity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system is segmented into at least three cyclone cells instead of only two, with each cell acting as an independent separation unit. This segmentation increases parallel processing capacity while maintaining the counter-rotation principle for reliable particle discharge

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The asymmetric arrangement of right-handed and left-handed cyclone cells is extended to three or more cells, creating a balanced configuration that maintains particle discharge efficiency while significantly increasing separation capacity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

3Volume of moving object

If a compact multi-cell cyclone design is used to reduce installation space, then the volume occupied is reduced, but particle accumulations occur within the compact structure

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinstallation spaceVSAvoidparticle accumulation
Core Design Contradiction:
Volume of moving objectVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

Multiple cyclone cells are nested or arranged in a compact multi-cell configuration where cells are positioned adjacent and above each other within a common housing, significantly reducing the overall volume and installation space required compared to separate cyclone units

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

Solution Approach 2:

The compact nested design incorporates asymmetric counter-rotating cells that prevent particle accumulation even in the confined space, ensuring that the reduced volume does not compromise particle discharge efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This design effectively prevents particle accumulation, maintains high separation efficiency, reduces the risk of clogging, and allows for a more compact and cost-effective cyclone separator installation, eliminating the need for separate dust collection chambers.

Implementation Method 1

A fluid which is flowing into a cyclone cell is guided in such a way that centrifugal forces accelerate the particles that are to be separated from the fluid in outward direction

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCentrifugal force: Centrifugal Force

Implementation Method 2

guiding devices or guiding apparatus are used which comprise guide vanes that generate a turbulent flow within a cell pipe of the respective cyclone cells

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectTurbulent flow: Turbulence

Data Source

PatentUS9937457B2Cyclone separator as well as filtering device with cyclone separator
Publication Date: 2018.04.10 MANN HUMMEL GMBH
  • US9937457B2 patent drawing
  • US9937457B2 patent drawing
  • US9937457B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A cyclone separator for separating liquid and/or solid particles from a fluid is provided with three or more cyclone cells that each have a cell pipe provided with a guiding device. The guiding devices cause the fluid to rotate and to separate the particles from the fluid by the rotation of the fluid. The cell pipes each have a particle exit opening for letting out the particles that have been separated by rotation from the fluid. One or more particle outlets are provided to discharge from the cyclone separator the particles that have exited from the cell pipes.