Multi-Channel Control Signal Priority for Sync Error Robustness

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional multi-channel data transmission systems face challenges in determining the correct control signal type due to errors in synchronization signals under poor transmission quality, leading to potential mistakes in data reading and degraded system robustness when fixed priorities are used without considering varying time periods.

Innovation Solution

A method that determines control signal priority based on data arrangement characteristics and evaluates channel accuracy to select the target type of control signals across multiple channels during different time periods, using a predetermined evaluating scheme to generate accuracy results and prioritize control signals accordingly.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If fixed priority is used to select control signals when multiple types have the same amount, then the selection process is simple and fast, but system robustness and consistency are degraded

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol signal selection speedVSAvoidsystem robustness
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dynamics by transitioning from a static fixed priority system to a dynamic priority system that adapts based on channel accuracy evaluations. The control signal selection priority is no longer fixed but changes according to the evaluated accuracy of different channels, allowing the system to respond to varying transmission conditions and maintain both speed and reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the parameter of control signal selection priority from a fixed value to a variable value that depends on channel accuracy evaluation results. By introducing channel accuracy as a new parameter that influences priority selection, the system can make more informed decisions about which control signals to adopt, improving robustness while maintaining efficient operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If decision by majority is applied to select control signals, then the system can handle errors in synchronization signals, but inconsistencies occur when multiple control signal types have the same amount

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveerror correction capabilityVSAvoidcontrol signal selection consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback by evaluating channel accuracy and using these evaluation results to influence control signal selection. The system continuously monitors the transmission quality and adjusts its selection criteria based on feedback from accuracy evaluations, ensuring consistent and reliable control signal adoption even when multiple types have equal distribution.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies preliminary action by performing channel accuracy evaluations before making control signal selection decisions. This preliminary assessment of channel conditions allows the system to prepare appropriate selection strategies in advance, preventing inconsistent decisions from occurring when multiple control signal types have the same amount.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Ease of manufacture

If conventional multi-channel system uses fixed priority for control signal selection, then the implementation is straightforward, but system robustness is degraded under varying transmission conditions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem implementation simplicityVSAvoidsystem robustness
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transforms the static fixed priority mechanism into a dynamic system that adapts to varying transmission conditions. By introducing channel accuracy evaluation and using these results to adjust selection priorities, the system maintains implementation feasibility while significantly improving robustness under different transmission quality conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the selection priority parameter from a fixed constant to a variable that reflects actual channel conditions. This parameter change allows the system to maintain simplicity in implementation while achieving superior robustness, as the priority values are determined by evaluating channel accuracy rather than being hard-coded.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS20080298499A1Method for determining target type of control signals in multi-channel system
Publication Date: 2008.12.04 REALTEK SEMICON CORP
  • US20080298499A1 patent drawing
  • US20080298499A1 patent drawing
  • US20080298499A1 patent drawing

AI summary

The present invention discloses a method for determining a target type of a plurality of control signals respectively transmitted via a plurality of channels in a multi-channel system. The method includes: receiving a plurality of first control signals simultaneously from the channels during a first time period; determining a control signal priority corresponding to the first time period according to a target type determined by actual types of a plurality of second control signals respectively transmitted via the channels during a second time period, wherein the second time period is prior to the first time period; and determining the target type of the first control signals according to the control signal priority and actual types of the first control signals.