Multi-Channel Object Detection for Unlabeled Road Objects

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing object detection techniques for autonomous vehicles rely heavily on labor-intensive human annotation for pre-defined object classes, failing to accurately identify and classify unlabeled objects such as animals, traffic cones, and construction signs, and are inefficient in resource-limited environments.

Innovation Solution

A method that processes sensor data from multiple channels, including LiDAR and cameras, to generate segmentation masks, fuse data, and cluster unlabeled objects using BEV road masks, denoising techniques, and parallel processing to enhance accuracy, robustness, and efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If human annotation is used for pre-defined object classes, then object detection accuracy for known objects is improved, but the system fails to identify unlabeled objects and requires labor-intensive processes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveobject detection accuracyVSAvoidmanual labeling requirement
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSExtent of automation

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs self-labeling by automatically identifying and classifying unlabeled objects through clustering algorithms that analyze sensor data patterns without requiring manual annotation. The neural network processes sensor inputs and generates object classifications autonomously, enabling the system to detect and label objects such as animals, traffic cones, and construction signs that were previously unrecognizable to automated systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the approach from using fixed pre-defined object classes to dynamically generating object categories based on detected patterns in sensor data. By adjusting the classification parameters to accommodate unlabeled objects and using clustering techniques, the system adapts its object recognition capabilities to identify previously unknown object types while maintaining accuracy for known objects.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If multi-channel sensor data is processed to detect unlabeled objects, then detection accuracy and robustness are improved, but computation resources and processing time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection robustnessVSAvoidcomputation resource consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the sensor data processing into distinct channels, processing image data from cameras and point cloud data from LiDAR separately through dedicated neural network branches. This segmentation allows each channel to be optimized independently and enables the system to focus computational resources on processing only the most relevant data types for detecting specific object categories, thereby reducing overall computation burden while maintaining robustness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system merges processed information from multiple sensor channels by combining segmentation masks from image data with spatial information from point cloud data. This fusion approach leverages the complementary strengths of different sensors to improve detection accuracy for unlabeled objects while efficiently managing computational resources through coordinated processing of multiple data sources.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Speed

If real-time processing of sensor data is implemented, then response time is improved, but processing complexity and computational load increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereal-time processing speedVSAvoidprocessing system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary processing actions by pre-processing sensor data to generate segmentation masks and identifying potential object regions before final classification. This preliminary action divides the complex real-time processing task into manageable stages, allowing the system to prepare data structures and identify candidate objects in advance, thereby reducing the computational complexity of real-time decision-making while maintaining fast response times.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Improves accuracy and robustness in detecting unlabeled objects by fusing multi-channel sensor data, reduces computation costs, and ensures compatibility with industrial standards, enabling real-time object detection in diverse environments.

Implementation Method 1

An optical sensor can include a light detection and ranging (LiDAR) sensor, which can generate a three-dimensional point cloud for each frame of multiple frames based on reflected optical signals for the frame

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLight detection and ranging (LiDAR): LIDAR

Data Source

PatentUS20250363640A1Object detection using multi-channel data
Publication Date: 2025.11.27 BLACK SESAME TECH INC
  • US20250363640A1 patent drawing
  • US20250363640A1 patent drawing
  • US20250363640A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods, systems, and apparatuses, including computer programs encoded on computer storage media, for processing a sequence of frames. The methods comprise receiving sensor data capturing unlabeled objects in a sequence of frames. The sensor data comprises first-type and second-type sensor data. For each frame of the sequence of frames, the first-type sensor data is processed to generate one or more segmentation masks for the frame. A road mask representing road surface information is generated based at least on the one or more segmentation masks. For each frame in the sequence of frames, a correlation between the first-type sensor data and the second-type sensor data is generated. Using the respective correlations and the road mask, the second-type sensor data is filtered to remove a portion of the second-type sensor data that is irrelevant to the unlabeled objects. The remaining second-type sensor data is clustered to classify one or more unlabeled objects.