Multi-Cloud FinOps Maturity Scoring for Governance Consistency

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Organizations operating in multi-cloud environments face challenges with inconsistent governance practices, limited visibility across cloud services, inability to track maturity progress, and lack of standardized assessment methodologies for FinOps governance, leading to inefficient resource utilization and excessive expenditure.

Innovation Solution

A multi-cloud governance platform provides a FinOps Governance Maturity Assessment framework that evaluates cloud accounts using predefined policies, generates maturity scores, and offers optimization recommendations through a user interface, enabling continuous assessment and improvement.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If organizations deploy workloads across multiple cloud providers with distributed teams, then workload flexibility and scalability are improved, but governance consistency and cost optimization become more difficult to maintain

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveworkload flexibilityVSAvoidgovernance consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the multi-cloud environment into distinct cloud accounts and regions, allowing centralized governance policies to be applied to each segment independently. This enables consistent governance across distributed teams while maintaining the flexibility of multi-cloud deployment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The governance platform provides universal assessment and optimization capabilities that work across multiple cloud providers (AWS, Azure, GCP). The same evaluation framework and policy engine can be applied consistently across different cloud environments, ensuring governance consistency without sacrificing workload flexibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Ease of manufacture

If basic cost management tools are used, then implementation simplicity is improved, but comprehensive governance capability and visibility across multi-cloud environments are limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimplementation simplicityVSAvoidvisibility across cloud services
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The system merges multiple governance functions (cost optimization, resource utilization, compliance, security) into a single unified platform. This consolidation provides comprehensive visibility across multi-cloud environments while maintaining ease of implementation through a single integrated solution rather than multiple separate tools.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The governance platform acts as an intermediary layer between cloud service providers and organizational teams. It collects and centralizes data from multiple cloud accounts and regions, providing comprehensive visibility and context that enables informed governance decisions without requiring direct access to complex cloud infrastructure details.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Ease of operation

If existing cost management tools provide recommendations, then actionable guidance is improved, but contextualization within broader maturity assessment and systematic improvement is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveactionable guidanceVSAvoidmaturity assessment context
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements continuous feedback loops that provide both immediate actionable recommendations and long-term maturity assessment context. Organizations receive real-time guidance on cost optimization while simultaneously being evaluated against maturity frameworks that track progress over time, enabling both immediate action and systematic improvement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The platform adds the dimension of maturity assessment context to traditional cost management recommendations. By evaluating governance practices across multiple dimensions (policy implementation, resource optimization, compliance, security) and providing contextualized scores and benchmarks, the system enables organizations to understand their relative maturity level and prioritize improvements systematically.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

4Adaptability or versatility

If manual assessment methods are used, then customization flexibility is improved, but assessment scalability and continuous evaluation capability are limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveassessment customizationVSAvoidassessment scalability
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The governance platform performs self-service assessment by automatically collecting data from cloud accounts, applying evaluation policies, and generating maturity scores without requiring manual intervention. This automation enables continuous, scalable assessment across multiple cloud environments while maintaining the flexibility to customize assessment criteria through configurable policies that can be adapted to different organizational needs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS20250378408A1Finops governance maturity assessment with a multi-cloud governance platform
Publication Date: 2025.12.11 CORESTACK INC
  • US20250378408A1 patent drawing
  • US20250378408A1 patent drawing
  • US20250378408A1 patent drawing

AI summary

In one aspect, a method for assessing FinOps governance maturity in a multi-cloud environment is presented. The method begins with onboarding a cloud account to a multi-cloud governance platform. Following onboarding, the method involves pulling resources, resource utilizations, resource costs, budget data, and cloud provider recommendations from the cloud account. Next, a set of predefined policies is executed on the resources to identify optimization recommendations for each of the resources. Based on these optimization recommendations, a maturity score for the cloud account is calculated. The method then generates a FinOps governance maturity assessment report comprising the maturity score and the optimization recommendations. Finally, the FinOps governance maturity assessment report is provided to a user interface for display to the user.