Multiconductor Jack Flat Electrode Radial Contact

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional methods for increasing the number of electrodes in multiconductor plugs and jacks face limitations, such as subdividing the post axis or adding electrodes to the plug cover, which complicates the structure and increases diameter, necessitating a novel approach to enhance electrode count.

Innovation Solution

A multiconductor jack and plug design featuring a rod-shaped shaft with exposed electrodes and a flat electrode on the flange portion, where the flat electrode is perpendicular to the axis, allowing for increased electrode count without complicating the structure, using a casing with electrically conductive terminals that generate elastic forces for reliable contact.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Quantity of substance

If electrodes are provided on the interior and exterior surfaces of the plug cover, then the number of electrodes increases, but the diameter of the jack increases and the structure becomes complicated

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenumber of electrodesVSAvoidstructure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The invention transitions from conventional axial electrode arrangement to a radial/directional arrangement by introducing a flat electrode extending perpendicular to the axial direction. This dimensional change allows additional electrodes to be positioned without increasing the jack's diameter, effectively adding electrodes in a new spatial dimension rather than expanding the existing structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The invention segments the electrode configuration into distinct functional groups: conventional axial electrodes on the shaft portion and a separate flat electrode structure extending radially. This segmentation allows each electrode type to be optimized independently, with the flat electrode providing additional contact points without interfering with the axial electrode arrangement, thereby increasing total electrode count without proportionally increasing structural complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Quantity of substance

If the post is subdivided in the axial direction to increase electrode number, then the number of electrodes increases, but there is a limit to how much the number can be increased

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenumber of electrodesVSAvoidpost length
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSLength of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of continuing to subdivide the post axially (one-dimensional approach), the invention introduces electrodes in a radial direction perpendicular to the axial direction. This creates a two-dimensional electrode distribution pattern, allowing additional electrodes to be added without increasing the post length, thereby overcoming the limitation of axial subdivision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Quantity of substance

If the post is subdivided in the axial direction, then the number of electrodes increases, but the structure becomes more complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenumber of electrodesVSAvoidstructure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The invention separates the electrode system into modular components: the shaft portion with axial electrodes and the flat electrode structure extending radially. This segmentation allows the flat electrode to be added as a distinct element rather than requiring complex reconfiguration of existing axial electrodes, thereby increasing electrode count while maintaining relative structural simplicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This design enables a higher number of electrodes with reliable electrical contact, maintaining conductivity even under external forces and allowing for a simpler, compact jack structure, with the flat electrode's width optimized for effective contact.

Implementation Method 1

a second electrically conductive terminal having an elastic portion that extends in the axial direction of the multiconductor plug, and a contacting portion that comes into electrically conductive contact with the flat electrode of the multiconductor plug

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Data Source

PatentUS7901253B2Multiconductor jack and multiconductor plug
Publication Date: 2011.03.08 EXCEL DENSHI
  • US7901253B2 patent drawing
  • US7901253B2 patent drawing
  • US7901253B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A multiconductor plug (10) has exposed electrodes (11a through 11e) on a shaft portion (14) and an electrode (11f) located at an annular flat portion of a flange portion (15) perpendicular to an axial direction. A multiconductor jack (20) has a casing (21) forming a space capable of being occupied by the shaft portion (14) of the multiconductor plug (10), electrically conductive terminals (23a through 23e) that come into electrically conductive contact with the electrodes (11a through 11e) of the shaft portion (14) of the multiconductor plug (10), and an electrically conductive terminal (23f) having a contacting portion (23f1) for making electrically conductive contact with the flat electrode (11f) perpendicular to the axial direction and an elastic portion (23f3) that extends in the axial direction. The contacting portion (23f1) of the electrically conductive terminal (23f) presses against the electrode (11f) as a result of elastic forces parallel to the axial direction.