Multicopter Propeller Segmentation for Lift and Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current multicopter designs face challenges in scaling up due to slow response times of large motors, significant propeller and motor weights, and inertia issues, which hinder agile maneuvering and control, especially in larger vehicles requiring quick changes in propeller motor operation for tasks like hovering and sharp turns.

Innovation Solution

The design incorporates a chassis with larger lift propellers and smaller control propellers, all oriented in parallel planes, allowing for independent control of propeller speeds to manage lift and spatial orientation, with a computer system managing motor operations and load balancing to enhance maneuverability and payload capacity.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Power

If large motors and propellers are used to increase lifting capacity, then lifting power is improved, but response time deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelifting powerVSAvoidresponse time
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSSpeed

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the propeller system into two distinct segments: large lift propellers for generating lifting power and small control propellers for maneuvering. This segmentation allows each type of propeller to be optimized for its specific function, resolving the contradiction between lifting power and response time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different parts of the system have different properties: lift propellers are large with high power for lifting, while control propellers are small with quick response for maneuvering. This local differentiation of qualities allows the system to simultaneously achieve both high lifting capacity and agile control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Power

If motor size is increased to handle larger payloads, then lifting capacity is improved, but maneuverability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelifting capacityVSAvoidmaneuverability
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments control functions by assigning different propellers to different tasks: large lift propellers handle payload lifting while small control propellers handle maneuvering. This segmentation maintains ease of operation despite increased lifting capacity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The small control propellers serve multiple functions: they enable agile maneuvering and also assist in fine-tuning position during hovering. This multi-functionality maintains maneuverability while the system handles larger payloads.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Power

If propeller length is increased to improve lift, then lifting power is improved, but control responsiveness deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelifting powerVSAvoidcontrol responsiveness
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the propeller system into long lift propellers and short control propellers. The long propellers provide lifting power while the short propellers provide rapid control response, eliminating the trade-off between lift and responsiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different propellers have different local qualities: long propellers for lift generation and short propellers for quick response. This local quality differentiation allows the system to have both high lifting power and fast control response simultaneously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This configuration enables multicopters to achieve high lifting power while maintaining easy control and quick spatial position changes, addressing the scaling issues by optimizing propeller size and motor control for efficient operation.

Implementation Method 1

a group of propellers for lifting the multicopter body and a group of propellers for controlling the spatial orientation of the multicopter body

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAerodynamic lift: Aerofoil

Implementation Method 2

the at least two mounted lift motors each having a lift propeller, the at least four mounted control motors each having a control propeller

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic induction: Electromagnetic Induction

Data Source

PatentUS11807356B2Multicopter with different purpose propellers
Publication Date: 2023.11.07 SERGEY SHASHURIN
  • US11807356B2 patent drawing
  • US11807356B2 patent drawing
  • US11807356B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Described here are multicopter systems and methods of operating multicopter systems, including those with a chassis with at least two mounted lift motors and at least four mounted control motors mounted within the chassis, wherein, the at least two mounted lift motors each having a lift propeller, the at least four mounted control motors each having a control propeller, wherein the lift propellers and the control propellers are in parallel planes or coplanar, a computer mounted on the chassis, the computer in communication with the control motors, an electric power source mounted on the chassis, the electric power source connected to the control motors, and an antennae mounted on the chassis, in communication with the computer. In some examples, the control systems are encrypted.