Multicore Redundancy for Process Control Device Diversity

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Complexity in controlling and synchronizing advanced, intelligent field devices in industrial process control systems due to varied software interfaces, protocols, and drivers, which increases configuration effort and management complexity.

Innovation Solution

A multicore processing system with primary and shadow control processing devices, each with multiple cores, implementing redundancy schemes to manage communications and ensure efficient interaction with diverse field devices across different networks, using protocols like MODBUS and Ethernet, and maintaining synchronization for seamless failover.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If multiple intelligent field devices with different software interfaces, protocols, and drivers are integrated into a single process control system, then the system can control more diverse and advanced devices, but the configuration effort and management complexity increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice diversityVSAvoidconfiguration complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system divides the control processing into separate virtual devices, each handling specific device types or protocols. This segmentation allows complex device management to be broken down into manageable, isolated units, reducing overall configuration complexity while maintaining support for diverse field devices

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system creates a universal control architecture where a single process control system can manage multiple types of intelligent field devices through standardized interfaces. The virtual device abstraction layer provides universal functionality that adapts to different device protocols without requiring separate control systems for each device type

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Device complexity

If a single process control device manages all field devices across multiple networks, then the system structure is simplified, but the device becomes a single point of failure and configuration complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem structureVSAvoidsystem reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The control function is segmented into multiple virtual devices running on separate processing cores. Each virtual device manages specific networks or device groups independently. This segmentation distributes the control burden, preventing any single point of failure from taking down the entire system while maintaining a simplified external system structure

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different processing cores are assigned to handle different networks or device types based on their specific requirements. Each core can be optimized for its specific function, improving reliability through specialized handling while maintaining overall system simplicity through the virtualization layer

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Reliability

If redundant control processing devices are implemented to ensure continuous operation, then system reliability improves, but the configuration effort and system complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontinuous operationVSAvoidredundancy configuration
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Redundant control processing devices are merged into a single physical device with multiple virtual devices running on different cores. This combining provides redundancy and continuous operation capability while eliminating the need to configure and manage separate physical redundant devices, reducing configuration effort and system complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The single physical device is designed to perform multiple functions simultaneously - acting as both primary and backup control devices through its virtualized architecture. This multi-functionality provides redundancy benefits without requiring separate dedicated backup hardware, simplifying the overall redundancy configuration

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS10165043B2Multi-core device with separate redundancy schemes in a process control system
Publication Date: 2018.12.25 SCHNEIDER ELECTRIC SYSTEMS USA INC
  • US10165043B2 patent drawing
  • US10165043B2 patent drawing
  • US10165043B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A multicore system controls devices in a process control system. A primary control processing device having a primary master core and a primary remote core is configured for controlling communications on a first network among a first plurality of devices. The primary remote core is configured for controlling communications on a second network among a second plurality of devices. A shadow control processing device is coupled to the first and second networks for processing redundant communications among the devices. The shadow control processing device comprises a shadow master core and a shadow remote core. The shadow master core is configured for controlling communications on the first network among the first plurality of devices. The shadow remote core is configured for controlling communications on the second network among the second plurality of devices.