Multi-Dimensional Score for Network Equipment Benchmarking

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Data center managers face challenges in evaluating the performance of network equipment from different vendors due to varying test results for metrics like latency, jitter, and throughput, which lack characterization of overall performance and are sensitive to test setup conditions.

Innovation Solution

A method and system for generating a multi-dimensional score that combines individual test results from different performance parameters, such as jitter, latency, and throughput, to provide a composite performance index for data center or network devices, allowing for apples-to-apples comparison across vendors and test setups.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If multiple individual performance tests are conducted to evaluate network equipment, then detailed performance metrics are obtained, but the overall performance characterization remains insufficient and results vary with test setup conditions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveperformance metric measurementVSAvoidtest evaluation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines multiple individual performance test results (latency, jitter, throughput) into a single composite performance score. This merging process integrates separate measurements into one unified metric that characterizes overall device performance, eliminating the need to separately evaluate multiple metrics and their relative importances.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The composite performance score acts as an intermediary that translates complex multi-dimensional test results into a single comparable value. This intermediary metric bridges the gap between detailed individual measurements and overall performance characterization, enabling straightforward vendor comparisons without requiring deep expertise in interpreting multiple separate metrics.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If separate performance metrics are tested individually, then specific performance parameters are measured, but the ability to compare overall performance across different vendors is compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveperformance measurement reliabilityVSAvoiddevice selection process
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges multiple performance metrics into a single composite score that enables direct comparison between devices from different vendors. This combination maintains the reliability of individual measurements while providing a unified basis for vendor comparison and device selection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Measurement precision

If multiple standardized tests are performed for the same parameter, then comprehensive performance data is collected, but the difficulty in characterizing relative importance of different tests increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveperformance parameter testingVSAvoidtest result characterization
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines results from multiple standardized tests measuring the same parameter into a single composite metric. This merging eliminates the need to separately evaluate and weight different standardized test results, as the composite score inherently integrates all test outcomes into one comparable value.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentUS10606726B2Methods, systems and computer readable media for performing benchmark reference testing of data center and network equipment
Publication Date: 2020.03.31 KEYSIGHT TECH SINGAPORE (SALES) PTE LTD
  • US10606726B2 patent drawing
  • US10606726B2 patent drawing
  • US10606726B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods, systems, and computer readable media for benchmark reference testing of data center or network equipment are disclosed. One method includes, using a network or data center test device, executing a plurality of performance tests to test a plurality of different performance parameters of a network or data center device under test. The method further includes obtaining individual test results for each of the different performance parameters. The method further includes generating a multi-dimensional score that combines the individual test results from the different performance parameters to indicate a composite performance of the data center or network device. The method further includes outputting the multi-dimensional score to a user.