Multidimensional Weighting Interface for Decision Analysis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing systems for collaborative decision-making lack a robust mechanism for providing quantitative, multidimensional justifications for recommendations, often failing to account for individual preferences and needs, making it difficult for users to weigh advice effectively.

Innovation Solution

A user interface that allows users to input and visualize quantitatively weighted factors using N-dimensional spaces, where weights are calculated as the product of parameter values, providing an intuitive visual representation of overall weights, enabling users to easily see how each variable contributes to the final weight.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Quantity of substance

If online resources and forums are used to gather advice, then a large number of opinions can be obtained, but it becomes difficult to extract useful advice and aggregate information systematically

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenumber of opinions obtainedVSAvoiduseful advice extraction
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments advice into structured components including quantified factors, weighted criteria, and multidimensional justifications. Each recommendation is broken down into discrete, analyzable elements that can be systematically processed and compared, transforming unstructured forum posts into organized decision-making data.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transforms qualitative advice into quantitative parameters by assigning numerical weights to different factors and criteria. This parameter transformation enables systematic aggregation and comparison of multiple opinions through mathematical operations on the quantified data.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Ease of operation

If simple scoring systems are used in social networks, then ease of use is improved, but the ability to reflect multivariate scoring paradigms and individual preferences is lost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvescoring simplicityVSAvoidmultivariate scoring capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extends simple scoring by adding multiple dimensions including several criteria dimensions and weight dimensions. This multidimensional framework allows users to evaluate options across multiple factors simultaneously while maintaining an intuitive interface, resolving the contradiction between simplicity and complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a universal scoring framework that can accommodate different multivariate scoring paradigms and individual preferences through configurable criteria and weights. The same interface structure handles diverse evaluation scenarios, making the system both simple to use and highly adaptable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Measurement precision

If quantitative factors with multidimensional justifications are implemented, then decision-making precision is improved, but the complexity of the interface increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedecision-making precisionVSAvoidinterface complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses visual dimensionality (graphs and charts) to represent multidimensional justifications, transforming complex quantitative data into intuitive visual forms. This allows precise multidimensional analysis while maintaining interface simplicity through visual rather than numerical interaction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates visual representations (graphs, charts, and displays) that copy and represent the underlying quantitative data in an intuitive format. Users interact with visual copies of the data rather than the raw numbers themselves, reducing interface complexity while preserving measurement precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Data Source

PatentUS9047564B1User interface for entering and viewing quantitatively weighted factors for decision choices
Publication Date: 2015.06.02 KELLY PATRICK LAUGHLIN
  • US9047564B1 patent drawing
  • US9047564B1 patent drawing
  • US9047564B1 patent drawing

AI summary

An interface facilitates user input of quantitatively weighted recommendations, including weighted factors in support of decision choices. A user input mechanism allows a user to specify a factor in support of a choice, and to specify values for quantitative parameters associated with the factor along two or more axes. An overall quantitative weight for the factor is generated based on the specified quantitative parameters. In one embodiment, a graphical user interface is presented, wherein the user specifies the values for the weighting parameters by dragging a movable indicator within an N-dimensional space. Each axis of the N-dimensional space corresponds to a weighting parameter. An overall quantitative weight for the factor is calculated, for example, as the product of the specified values along each of the axes. A visual indication of this calculation is presented, so as to provide an intuitive sense of the overall weight assigned to the factor.