Multidisciplinary Chronic Care Model Without Specialist Referrals

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The existing healthcare delivery system is inefficient and fragmented for patients with chronic conditions, leading to high costs, poor coordination between primary care physicians (PCPs) and specialists, and inadequate access to multidisciplinary care, especially for those with multiple chronic conditions.

Innovation Solution

A novel outpatient clinic model that employs a collaborative multidisciplinary approach, utilizing a team of specialists including an immunologist, infectious disease specialist, cardiologist, and gastroenterologist, leveraging an online database and electronic medical records to provide comprehensive care through a 'meta-organism' paradigm, integrating gut microbiome analysis and immune modulation therapies, and eliminating the need for primary physician referrals.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a traditional referral-based healthcare delivery model is used, then specialists can provide expert care, but coordination between PCPs and specialists is poor and care is fragmented

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecoordination qualityVSAvoidcare delivery system
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges the functions of PCP and specialist into a single integrated care team led by a Care Coordinator. The Care Coordinator consolidates referral management, appointment scheduling, and information exchange, eliminating the fragmented referral-based model and improving coordination reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The Care Coordinator acts as an intermediary between patients, PCPs, and specialists. This mediator manages the care coordination process, ensuring seamless communication and reducing system complexity by centralizing coordination functions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Adaptability or versatility

If multiple specialists are involved in chronic condition care, then comprehensive care is provided, but access barriers and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomprehensive careVSAvoidaccess to care
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The Care Coordinator performs multiple functions including referral management, appointment scheduling, information exchange, and patient education. This multi-functional role provides comprehensive care coordination without requiring patients to navigate multiple separate systems, improving ease of access.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables self-service through patient portals and automated scheduling tools, allowing patients to access their care information and schedule appointments without extensive provider intervention, reducing access barriers while maintaining comprehensive care.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Stability of the object's composition

If primary care physicians coordinate all specialist referrals, then care continuity is maintained, but PCP workload increases and access to specialists decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecare continuityVSAvoidPCP efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the coordination workload from PCPs and transfers it to dedicated Care Coordinators. This separation allows PCPs to focus on clinical decision-making while Care Coordinators handle administrative coordination, maintaining care continuity without compromising PCP productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The care coordination function is segmented into a dedicated role (Care Coordinator) separate from clinical roles (PCP and specialist). This segmentation divides responsibilities clearly, improving both care continuity and provider efficiency by matching tasks to appropriate skill sets.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

4Ease of manufacture

If traditional fee-for-service model is used, then specialists are incentivized to perform procedures, but healthcare costs become unsustainable

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveservice deliveryVSAvoidhealthcare spending
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the payment parameter from fee-for-service to value-based reimbursement tied to quality metrics and patient outcomes. This incentivizes providers to deliver efficient, coordinated care rather than unnecessary procedures, reducing unsustainable spending while maintaining service delivery quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS20260045341A1Method of treating a chronic condition
Publication Date: 2026.02.12 CZERSKA BARBARA
  • US20260045341A1 patent drawing
  • US20260045341A1 patent drawing
  • US20260045341A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A healthcare delivery system that embodies methods of empowering collaborative multidisciplinary healthcare and the clinics that support them for providing everyday care to patients with chronic conditions, through in part by eliminating the current referral system to multiple specialists and providing collaborative multidisciplinary healthcare. A healthcare delivery that upends the traditional model where primary care physicians, who have an essentially blind first visit with a patient, try to develop plan of coordinated care in a very fragmented manner by referring patients to multiple specialists as needed. The present invention takes unconventional ordering of combined steps to deliver improved healthcare drastically differently from the traditional model.