Multielectrode Electrolytic Device for Ion Chromatography Suppression

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing electrolytic suppressors in ion chromatography systems suffer from directional ion movement, leading to differential swelling and flow characteristics in regenerant channels, which can impact chromatographic efficiency and require separate power sources for each electrode pair, resulting in inefficient regeneration and potential heat generation.

Innovation Solution

A two- or three-channel electrolytic device with electrodes arranged in a clasped finger-like pattern, allowing ion flow across both membranes without directionality, facilitating more uniform swelling and regeneration, and utilizing a single power supply for efficient ion exchange and reduced heat generation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If directional ion movement is used in electrolytic suppressors, then ion removal efficiency is improved, but differential swelling and flow characteristics in regenerant channels occur

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveion removal efficiencyVSAvoidflow characteristics uniformity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The patent inverts the conventional directional ion movement approach by implementing non-directional ion movement through strategic electrode placement. Instead of forcing ions to move in one direction through the membranes, the electrodes are positioned to allow ions to move freely across both membranes without preferential direction, thereby eliminating differential swelling while maintaining regeneration efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

2Measurement precision

If separate power sources are used for each electrode pair, then electrode control precision is improved, but device complexity and heat generation increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveelectrode control precisionVSAvoidpower source configuration
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges multiple separate power sources into a single common power source that supplies electricity to all electrode pairs. This consolidation reduces device complexity and minimizes heat generation while the non-directional ion movement mechanism maintains adequate control precision for the electrolytic suppression process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Reliability

If conventional electrolytic suppressor design is used, then ion exchange function is maintained, but regeneration uniformity and chromatographic efficiency decrease

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveion exchange functionVSAvoidregeneration efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies the inversion principle by reversing the conventional design approach. Instead of using directional ion movement to achieve ion exchange, it employs non-directional ion movement through strategically placed electrodes, allowing ions to naturally distribute across both membranes. This inversion maintains reliable ion exchange function while significantly improving regeneration uniformity and chromatographic efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The device achieves more uniform and efficient regeneration of ion exchange membranes, reduces gas generation in the sample flow channel, and enhances chromatographic performance by maintaining even flow characteristics in regenerant channels, while using a single power supply for improved operational efficiency.

Implementation Method 1

Current is passed between electrodes placed in each of the regenerant flow channels to facilitate generation of electrolysis ions, i.e. hydronium and hydroxide, from the water splitting reaction in the regenerant flow channels.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrolysis: Electrolysis

Implementation Method 2

A first chamber is separated from a sample flow chamber by a charged barrier which is capable of passing ions of one charge and of blocking bulk liquid flow.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectIon Exchange: Ion Exchange

Data Source

PatentEP2863217B1Multielectrode Electrolytic Device and Method
Publication Date: 2024.05.22 DIONEX CORP
  • EP2863217B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2863217B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP2863217B1 patent drawingFigure 3A~3B

AI summary

An electrolytic device comprising: a central sample flow channel, first and second regenerant flow channels, first and second charged barriers disposed between said sample flow channel and first and second regenerant flow channels, and pairs of oppositely charged, spaced electrodes disposed in the regenerant flow channels. Also, electrolytic devices with a different electrode configuration are described. Also, methods of using the devices, e.g., for suppression in an ion chromatography system are described.