Multi-Fabric Network Shelf for Transport Network Latency Reduction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current transport networks using routers, multiservice provisioning platforms (MSSPs), and optical add drop multiplexers (OADMs) are expensive, resource-intensive, and suffer from high latency due to their reliance on obsolete SONET/SDH circuit-based hierarchies, which are inadequate for the increasing packet traffic driven by internet-based applications.

Innovation Solution

A network element with three integrated fabrics - a packet fabric, an electrical fabric, and an optical fabric within a single shelf, enabling optical switching, packet switching, and inter-fabric circuitry for efficient lambda switching and error correction, thereby eliminating the need for packet processing at intermediate nodes.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If routers are used to process IP packets at intermediate nodes, then packet routing functionality is provided, but network cost and resource consumption increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepacket routing functionalityVSAvoidnetwork cost and resource consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts packet processing functionality from intermediate nodes by implementing end-to-end packet switching between source and destination nodes. Intermediate nodes only perform optical switching on lambda streams without extracting or processing individual packets, thereby eliminating the need for complex router hardware at each node while maintaining packet routing capability through source-destination pairing information stored in memory.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary mechanism where source and destination nodes establish packet switching paths and store pairing information in memory. This allows intermediate optical switches to forward packets along pre-established paths without intelligent processing, acting as simple optical mediators that reduce complexity while maintaining routing functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Adaptability or versatility

If packet processing is performed at intermediate nodes, then routing decisions can be made, but latency increases due to multiple processing stops

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverouting decision capabilityVSAvoidpacket transmission latency
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent removes packet processing operations from intermediate nodes, extracting only the essential optical switching function. By pre-establishing packet paths between source and destination nodes and storing pairing information in memory, the system eliminates repeated packet processing at each intermediate node, thereby reducing latency while maintaining routing capability through pre-computed paths.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

3Power

If MSSPs based on SONET/SDH hierarchy are used, then optical signal transmission is provided, but the system becomes obsolete for increasing packet traffic

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoptical signal transmission capabilityVSAvoidcompatibility with packet traffic
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges optical switching with packet switching capabilities in a unified system. By implementing end-to-end packet switching over optical networks with source-destination pairing information stored in memory, the system combines the high-capacity optical transmission capability with modern packet traffic handling, making the network adaptable to increasing packet traffic while maintaining optical signal transmission power.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

4Adaptability or versatility

If optical add drop multiplexers are used, then optical signal routing is provided, but network performance deteriorates due to high latency

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoptical signal routing capabilityVSAvoidnetwork performance latency
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts intelligent packet processing from intermediate optical nodes, leaving only simple optical switching functions. By pre-establishing packet paths and storing source-destination pairing information in memory at endpoint nodes, the system eliminates repeated optical processing and packet extraction at intermediate add-drop multiplexers, thereby reducing latency while maintaining optical signal routing capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Data Source

PatentUS9578400B2Network controller, a multi-fabric shelf and, a method of processing traffic in a transport network
Publication Date: 2017.02.21 CIENA CORP
  • US9578400B2 patent drawing
  • US9578400B2 patent drawing
  • US9578400B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A network element of a transport network has three fabrics housed within a single shelf of a telco rack, namely a packet fabric, an electrical fabric and an optical fabric. A stream of traffic including a plurality of lambdas is received at a trunk interface of such a shelf. The optical fabric in the shelf performs optical switching on the stream to replace a first lambda in the stream with a second lambda. The first lambda is converted within the shelf into an electrical signal. Also within the shelf, first frames are recovered from the electrical signal. The packet fabric in the shelf is used to perform packet switching on the first frames to generate a flow of second frames. The flow of second frames is transmitted at a client interface of the shelf.