Multi-Facet Data Ranking for Personalized Recommendation Accuracy

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing data item selection systems fail to effectively utilize intra-entity and inter-entity correlations and patterns in data consumption to provide personalized and adaptive recommendations, leading to inefficient user experiences in selecting data items.

Innovation Solution

An intelligent data processing system that employs machine learning and artificial intelligence techniques for multi-facet data pattern recognition and ranking, integrating intra-entity and inter-entity correlations to generate personalized recommendations based on historical data consumption patterns, using RFM segmentation and clustering algorithms to optimize data item selection.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If traditional data item selection systems are used, then system simplicity is maintained, but personalized recommendation capability and user experience are insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepersonalized recommendation capabilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the recommendation problem into multiple independent modules: correlation extraction module that processes intra-entity and inter-entity correlations separately, pattern recognition module that identifies selection patterns, and ranking module that generates personalized recommendations. This segmentation allows complex personalized recommendations to be built from simpler, specialized components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-computing and storing correlation metrics between data items, intra-entity selection patterns, and inter-entity relationships in advance. These pre-computed correlations are stored in data structures that enable rapid retrieval during recommendation generation, reducing real-time computational complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Measurement precision

If comprehensive data analysis is performed to improve recommendation accuracy, then recommendation precision is improved, but processing time and computational resources increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverecommendation accuracyVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies local quality by focusing computational analysis on locally relevant patterns specific to each entity's selection history and behavior. Instead of performing global analysis on all possible data item combinations, the system identifies and analyzes only the correlations and patterns relevant to the specific entity's past selections, achieving high accuracy with reduced processing time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes parameters by dynamically adjusting the depth and scope of correlation analysis based on entity characteristics, data availability, and computational constraints. The correlation extraction process adapts its parameters to balance analysis comprehensiveness with processing efficiency, allowing high accuracy when resources permit and faster processing when constraints exist.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If multiple correlation factors are integrated for comprehensive ranking, then recommendation quality is improved, but system complexity and computational burden increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverecommendation qualityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system merges multiple correlation factors (intra-entity correlations, inter-entity correlations, selection patterns, and contextual information) into a unified ranking framework. The ranking module integrates these diverse factors by computing a composite relevance score for each candidate data item, combining multiple signals into a single actionable recommendation ranking that improves quality without proportionally increasing complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

4Measurement precision

If historical data is extensively analyzed to extract patterns, then prediction accuracy is improved, but data processing complexity and storage requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepattern recognition accuracyVSAvoiddata storage requirements
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The system extracts only the essential correlation patterns and selection behaviors from historical data, storing compressed representations rather than raw historical records. The correlation extraction module identifies and stores key metrics such as item co-selection frequencies, entity-specific preference patterns, and contextual relationships, discarding redundant information while maintaining pattern recognition accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Data Source

PatentUS12481723B2Intelligent data ranking system based on multi-facet intra and inter-data correlation and data pattern recognition
Publication Date: 2025.11.25 ACCENTURE GLOBAL SOLUTIONS LTD
  • US12481723B2 patent drawing
  • US12481723B2 patent drawing
  • US12481723B2 patent drawing

AI summary

This disclosure is directed generally to an automatic intelligent electronic data processing system, platform, and method for computerized multi-facet data pattern recognition and ranking, and particularly to intelligently personalizing recommendation of data items for consumption by a particular entity based on past data consumption history of the entity and/or other entities via machine recognition of intra and/or inter-entity data item selection correlations. Such personalized recommendation may be based on a multi-facet ranking of the data items by integrating various intra-entity and inter-entity correlations and patterns in data item consumption into a quantifiable entity-specific ranking score for each data item that may potentially be selected for consumption by a particular entity.