Multi-Fuel Combustion System with Steam Injection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Combustion systems for generating electricity from syngas fuels face challenges due to their low calorific value and high hydrogen content, requiring adapted systems that can handle varying fuel compositions while minimizing emissions and maintaining efficiency, especially when transitioning between different fuels like natural gas and syngas.

Innovation Solution

A multi-fuel combustion system with a two-phase operation method, utilizing a first conduit for igniting natural gas and a second conduit for syngas, with steam injection to manage pressure and emissions, and a third conduit for fuel injection to enhance combustion efficiency and reduce NOx emissions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If a combustion system is designed for syngas fuel, then it can handle low calorific value and high hydrogen content fuels, but it cannot reliably operate with conventional fuels like natural gas

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefuel type adaptabilityVSAvoidcombustion stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The combustion system is designed with multi-fuel capability, incorporating a dual-conduit fuel delivery system where the first conduit is optimized for natural gas and the second conduit is optimized for syngas. The system can operate with either fuel type or both simultaneously, making it universally applicable to different fuel sources while maintaining reliable combustion performance for each fuel type through dedicated delivery pathways.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Object-generated harmful factors

If the system operates with syngas fuel, then it achieves cleaner combustion, but efficiency is reduced due to low calorific value

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveemissionsVSAvoidcombustion efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-generated harmful factorsVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system merges the operation of two different fuel types by allowing simultaneous supply of natural gas through the first conduit and syngas through the second conduit to the same combustor. This combination enables the high calorific value natural gas to compensate for the low calorific value of syngas, thereby maintaining overall combustion efficiency while still achieving the emission benefits of syngas combustion.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts the fuel flow parameters by controlling the steam injection rates into the first and second conduits separately. By varying the steam-to-fuel ratios in each conduit, the system can optimize the mixture composition to maintain efficient combustion despite the differing calorific values of the fuel types, while also controlling emissions parameters.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Object-generated harmful factors

If steam is injected into the fuel conduits, then pressure is controlled and emissions are reduced, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveemissionsVSAvoidsystem structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-generated harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The steam injection system serves multiple functions simultaneously: it controls the pressure of the fuel gases in the conduits, dilutes the fuel-air mixture to reduce NOx emissions, and provides thermal energy to the combustion process. By incorporating steam injection into the existing fuel delivery conduits, the system achieves multiple objectives without requiring separate dedicated equipment for each function, thereby limiting the increase in overall system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system effectively handles different fuel types, maintaining efficiency and reducing emissions by optimizing fuel flow and steam injection, allowing for stable operation across varying loads and fuel compositions, thereby improving overall combustion performance and meeting environmental regulations.

Implementation Method 1

supplying steam to the first conduit in addition to the first type of fuel and supplying steam to the second conduit after the ignition

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSteam injection:

Implementation Method 2

providing ignition to a combustor basket to ignite a first type of fuel

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCombustion: Combustion

Implementation Method 3

supplying steam to the first conduit in addition to the first type of fuel and supplying steam to the second conduit after the ignition

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSteam dilution:

Data Source

PatentUS8375724B2Method of operating a multi-fuel combustion system
Publication Date: 2013.02.19 SIEMENS ENERGY GLOBAL GMBH & CO KG
  • US8375724B2 patent drawing
  • US8375724B2 patent drawing
  • US8375724B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of operating a multi-fuel combustion system is provided. The method includes a first phase and a second phase, wherein the first phase includes providing ignition to a combustor basket to ignite a first type of fuel, where the first type of fuel is supplied to the combustor basket through a first conduit. Also in first phase steam is also supplied to the first conduit in addition to the first type of fuel and steam is supplied to the second conduit after the ignition. In the second phase a second type of fuel is supplied to the combustor basket through the second conduit after ignition of the first fuel through the first conduit, while stopping the supply of the first fuel, and continuing to supply steam through both the first and second conduits.