Multi-Fuel Engine Control System for Degradation Detection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing engine systems fail to effectively account for degradation in fuel delivery systems over time, leading to performance issues and potential emissions problems, particularly in multi-fuel capable engines used in stationary power plants and vehicles.

Innovation Solution

A system comprising a liquid fuel system, a gaseous fuel system, and a control system that delivers both fuels over a range of engine operating points and performs tests to indicate degradation in the gaseous fuel system, ensuring optimal performance and minimizing emissions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the engine operates over time without monitoring, then operational simplicity is maintained, but fuel system degradation occurs leading to performance deterioration

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefuel system performanceVSAvoidmonitoring system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control system performs preliminary testing of the gaseous fuel system at designated intervals before degradation affects engine performance. By proactively identifying degradation early through controlled fuel delivery and monitoring at various operating points, the system can maintain reliability without requiring continuous complex monitoring throughout all operational conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The control system monitors engine output parameters (such as power, torque, or exhaust characteristics) and uses this feedback to detect changes in fuel system performance. By comparing current engine output against expected values and identifying deviations that indicate degradation, the system maintains fuel system reliability through continuous, simple feedback monitoring rather than complex proactive testing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Object-generated harmful factors

If fuel delivery systems are not tested regularly, then system simplicity is maintained, but emissions problems arise due to degraded performance

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveemissionsVSAvoidtesting and maintenance time
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-generated harmful factorsVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The control system performs preliminary fuel system testing at predetermined intervals or under specific conditions before emissions problems develop. By conducting controlled tests at various engine operating points and comparing actual fuel delivery against expected performance, the system can identify and address degradation early, preventing emissions problems without requiring continuous extensive testing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The control system varies operating parameters (such as engine load, fuel type ratio, or temperature) during testing to stress different components of the fuel system. By conducting tests across a range of operating conditions rather than at a single point, the system can comprehensively assess fuel delivery performance and detect degradation that would lead to emissions problems, while limiting testing time through targeted parameter variation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Ease of operation

If the system operates at a fixed fuel delivery rate, then operational simplicity is maintained, but performance deteriorates due to unaccounted system degradation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefuel delivery controlVSAvoidengine performance
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The control system dynamically adjusts fuel delivery rates based on detected system performance and operating conditions. Rather than maintaining a fixed delivery rate, the system monitors engine output and fuel system response, then modifies fuel delivery to compensate for degradation. This dynamic adjustment maintains engine performance reliability while keeping the control logic simple through condition-based adjustments rather than continuous complex optimization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The control system continuously monitors engine output parameters and uses this feedback to detect changes in fuel delivery system performance. By comparing actual engine response against expected values and adjusting fuel delivery accordingly, the system maintains optimal performance despite degradation. The feedback mechanism keeps control simple by using direct engine output measurements rather than complex predictive models.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS11060469B2Systems for a multi-fuel capable engine
Publication Date: 2021.07.13 TRANSPORTATION IP HOLDINGS LLC
  • US11060469B2 patent drawing
  • US11060469B2 patent drawing
  • US11060469B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Various methods and systems are provided for a multi-fuel capable engine. The system includes a liquid fuel system to deliver liquid fuel to an engine, a gaseous fuel system to deliver gaseous fuel to the engine, and a control system. The control system, during a gaseous fuel system test mode, controls the liquid fuel system and the gaseous fuel system to deliver the liquid fuel and the gaseous fuel to the engine over a range of engine operating points, and indicate degradation of the gaseous fuel system based on engine output at each of the engine operating points.