Multilayer Bi-Layer Stack for Scratch-Resistant Optical Substrates

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing cover substrates for consumer electronic products face challenges in maintaining scratch resistance and optical performance, as they often suffer from microductile scratches and abrasion damage, which degrade the appearance and functionality of displays, and current solutions compromise either scratch resistance or optical properties.

Innovation Solution

A stack of N bi-layers with different compositions and microstructures, having a thickness of at least 5 nm, is applied to the substrate, achieving a refractive index between 1.2 and 2.2 and a hardness of 15 GPa or greater, providing enhanced scratch resistance and retained optical clarity.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If a single-layer scratch-resistant coating is applied to the substrate, then scratch resistance is improved, but optical properties (transmission, reflectivity, color consistency) deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvescratch resistanceVSAvoidoptical properties
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the scratch-resistant coating into multiple layers with different compositions and functions. The first layer (higher hardness material) provides scratch resistance, while the second layer (lower refractive index material) optimizes optical properties by reducing interference effects and improving light transmission. This segmentation allows each layer to specialize in one function, resolving the contradiction between scratch resistance and optical performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses composite materials by combining two different materials in a layered structure. The first layer uses a higher hardness material (such as silicon oxide, silicon nitride, or silicon oxynitride) for scratch resistance, while the second layer uses a material with lower refractive index (such as magnesium fluoride, silicon oxide, or silicon oxynitride) for optical optimization. This composite approach enables simultaneous achievement of both scratch resistance and good optical properties.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Reliability

If hard coating materials are used to prevent scratches, then durability is improved, but optical clarity and color consistency deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovedurabilityVSAvoidoptical clarity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSIllumination intensity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the coating into two layers where the first layer (hard material) handles durability and the second layer (optically optimized material) handles clarity. This functional segmentation allows the hard material to provide durability without compromising optical properties, as the second layer compensates for any optical interference caused by the first layer.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies local quality by giving each layer different properties tailored to its specific function. The first layer has high hardness for durability, while the second layer has optimized refractive index for optical clarity. This local optimization of properties in different regions (layers) of the coating resolves the contradiction between durability and optical clarity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Strength

If abrasion-resistant solutions are applied to the substrate, then resistance to multiple contact events is improved, but scratch resistance from single contact events deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveabrasion resistanceVSAvoidscratch resistance
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the protective coating into two specialized layers: the first layer (harder material) is optimized for resisting single-contact scratches through its high hardness, while the second layer (softer, more ductile material) provides abrasion resistance through better adherence and flexibility. This segmentation allows each layer to address different damage mechanisms without interfering with the other's function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies local quality by tailoring the properties of each layer to specific protective functions. The first layer has high hardness locally optimized for scratch resistance, while the second layer has different properties (lower hardness, better adherence) locally optimized for abrasion resistance. This local differentiation resolves the contradiction between single-event scratch resistance and multi-event abrasion resistance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS10730790B2Optical structures and articles with multilayer stacks having high hardness and methods for making the same
Publication Date: 2020.08.04 CORNING INC
  • US10730790B2 patent drawing
  • US10730790B2 patent drawing
  • US10730790B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Optically transparent articles and structures that include or are otherwise disposed on a substantially transparent substrate. These articles and structures also include a stack of N (N>2) bi-layers on the substrate, the stack having a thickness of at least 5 nm. Each bi-layer is defined by (a) a first layer; and (b) a second layer disposed on the first layer, the layers having at least one of different compositions and different microstructures. The stack has a stack refractive index between about 1.2 and about 2.2 or between about 100% and about 150% of a refractive index of the substrate, and a stack hardness of 15 GPa or greater when measured with a Berkovich Indenter Hardness Test along an indentation depth in the range from about 10% to about 50% of the thickness of the stack disposed on a glass test substrate having a hardness between 6.5 and 8 GPa.