Multilayer Coil Electrode Layout for Lower Stray Capacitance

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The existing multilayer coil components face challenges in increasing the inner diameter of the coil while maintaining terminal electrode placement, leading to increased stray capacitance and deteriorated characteristics due to the embedding of terminal electrodes within the element body.

Innovation Solution

The multilayer coil component design includes terminal electrodes embedded within the element body, allowing them to fit within the outer shape without protruding, enabling an increase in coil diameter and reducing stray capacitance by ensuring overlap only when viewed from specific directions, thus improving the Q value and overall characteristics.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Volume of moving object

If the terminal electrode is embedded in the element body, then the component size is reduced, but the inner diameter of the coil cannot be increased

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomponent sizeVSAvoidinner diameter of coil
Core Design Contradiction:
Volume of moving objectVSLength of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The terminal electrode is configured to extend in multiple directions: along the stacking direction of insulator layers and along the winding direction of the coil. This multi-dimensional extension allows the electrode to reach the coil winding in the radial direction while maintaining embedding in the element body, thereby enabling increased coil inner diameter without increasing component size.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Reliability

If the inner diameter of the coil is increased, then the Q value is improved, but the distance between the terminal electrode and the coil decreases, increasing stray capacitance

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveQ valueVSAvoidstray capacitance
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The terminal electrode has non-uniform cross-sectional area along its extension direction, with the cross-sectional area being larger at portions closer to the coil winding and smaller at portions farther away. This gradient structure allows the electrode to maintain close proximity to the coil for good electrical contact (improving Q value) while having a tapered form that reduces parasitic capacitance effects.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Volume of moving object

If the terminal electrode is embedded in the element body, then the component size is reduced, but stray capacitance increases due to decreased distance between electrode and coil

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomponent sizeVSAvoidstray capacitance
Core Design Contradiction:
Volume of moving objectVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The terminal electrode's cross-sectional area is varied along its length, creating a parameter gradient where the area decreases from the coil-facing end toward the opposite end. This parameter change optimizes the balance between maintaining small component size through embedding and reducing stray capacitance by having smaller electrode area near the coil winding.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS11830664B2Multilayer coil component
Publication Date: 2023.11.28 TDK CORP
  • US11830664B2 patent drawing
  • US11830664B2 patent drawing
  • US11830664B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A multilayer coil component 1 includes an element body 2, a coil 8, and a terminal electrode 4 and a terminal electrode 5. Each of the terminal electrode 4 and the terminal electrode 5 is disposed over at least the end surfaces 2a and 2b and a main surface 2d. Each of the terminal electrode 4 and the terminal electrode 5 and at least a part of the coil 8 overlap when viewed from the facing direction of the pair of side surfaces 2e and 2f. Each of the terminal electrode 4 and the terminal electrode 5 and the coil 8 do not overlap when viewed from the facing direction of the pair of end surfaces 2a and 2b.