Multilayer Electrode Films for Energy Density and Power Balance

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing energy storage devices, such as lithium-ion batteries, face challenges with charge/discharge rates, energy density, power performance, and durability due to limitations in electrode architecture, particularly in multidimensional designs, which lack precision, durability, and high-speed manufacturing capabilities.

Innovation Solution

The development of multilayer and multidimensional electrode films using actinic and electron beam radiation, combined with EB curable binders and high-aspect ratio additives, allows for improved energy storage devices with enhanced energy and power density, and high-speed manufacturing.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Quantity of substance

If electrode thickness is increased to provide increased energy density, then energy density is improved, but power density diminishes and durability is compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy densityVSAvoidpower density
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSPower

Solution Approach 1:

The electrode is divided into multiple layers with different thicknesses and compositions. The first layer (closer to substrate) has different properties than the second layer (exterior layer), allowing optimization of both energy density and power density across different regions of the electrode structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different regions of the electrode are assigned different material compositions and structural properties. The first layer contains specific ratios of electrochemically active material, conductive additive, and binder that differ from the second layer, creating local optimization for both energy storage and power delivery.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Quantity of substance

If electrode thickness is increased to provide increased energy density, then energy density is improved, but durability is compromised at the interface with substrates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy densityVSAvoiddurability
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The first layer in contact with the substrate is formulated with specific material compositions that enhance adhesion and mechanical stability at the critical electrode-substrate interface, while the second layer optimizes for energy storage capacity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

By segmenting the electrode into multiple layers with distinct compositions, the patent isolates the interface region (first layer) with properties optimized for durability and bonding, preventing the compromises that would affect a uniform thick electrode.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Power

If multidimensional electrode architecture is used to improve performance, then energy and power density are improved, but manufacturing speed decreases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower densityVSAvoidmanufacturing speed
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The multidimensional electrode structure is segmented into multiple layers that can be manufactured sequentially using roll-to-roll processing, enabling high-speed manufacturing while achieving the performance benefits of complex architectures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces slow transfer molding processes with rapid roll-to-roll coating and curing technologies, substituting mechanical transfer operations with continuous coating and in-line radiation curing to achieve high manufacturing speeds.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

4Shape

If transfer molding is used to manufacture 3D electrodes, then complex architectures are achieved, but manufacturing speed is nearly 1000× slower than roll-to-roll processes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveelectrode architectureVSAvoidmanufacturing speed
Core Design Contradiction:
ShapeVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the mechanical transfer molding process with a roll-to-roll coating system combined with actinic and electron beam radiation curing, substituting slow mechanical operations with rapid continuous processing and in-line polymerization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent utilizes phase transition of the binder material through radiation-induced polymerization, transforming the binder from a liquid or soft state during coating to a cured solid state, enabling rapid in-line manufacturing without slow drying or curing steps.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #36Phase transitions

5Ease of manufacture

If typical polymers and conductive additives are used in thicker planar electrodes, then manufacturing is simplified, but durability is poor

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing simplicityVSAvoiddurability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs composite material systems where the binder is a polymerizable composition containing multiple functional components that work synergistically to provide both ease of manufacture and superior durability in thick electrode structures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the chemical and physical parameters of the binder material through radiation-induced polymerization, transforming typical polymers into crosslinked networks with enhanced mechanical strength, chemical stability, and adhesion properties for improved durability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution provides energy storage devices with increased energy and power density, durability, and cost-effective manufacturing, surpassing the limitations of traditional planar electrodes.

Implementation Method 1

a polymerizable binder, curable by actinic and electron beam radiation

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPhotopolymerisation: Photopolymerisation

Implementation Method 2

curable by actinic and electron beam radiation

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectron beam radiation: Electron Beam

Data Source

PatentUS12355081B2Multilayer and/or multidimensional electrode films for energy storage devices, and methods thereof
Publication Date: 2025.07.08 OCELLA INC
  • US12355081B2 patent drawing
  • US12355081B2 patent drawing
  • US12355081B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present disclosure describes energy storage (e.g., electrochemical) devices with customized architectures. Such customized architectures include multilayered electrode films and/or multidimensional electrode films.