Multilayer Decontamination Coating With Hydrogel Trapping Layer

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing decontamination systems for toxic chemical compounds, such as organophosphorus compounds, lack reproducibility and uniform application, leading to potential overuse and inefficiency in decontaminating surfaces.

Innovation Solution

A decontamination coating with a multilayer structure comprising a porous support, a trapping layer formed by hydrogel for adsorption and chemical degradation, and a holding film to maintain the support's shape, ensuring uniform and reproducible application.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If decontamination systems are applied in the form of gel, spray or pulverization, then the decontaminating materials can reach the contaminated surfaces, but the dosage is not optimal and homogeneous, leading to overuse and inefficiency

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedosage uniformityVSAvoiddecontaminant overuse
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The decontaminant is pre-applied to a support structure in a controlled manufacturing environment, creating a pre-dosed coating before deployment. This preliminary action ensures uniform distribution and eliminates the need for field application, thereby preventing overuse and ensuring optimal dosage on contaminated surfaces.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the mechanical application systems (spray guns, pulverization equipment) with a pre-formed coating system. The decontaminant is transferred from a liquid/spray state to a solid coating state on a support, eliminating the variability inherent in mechanical application methods and ensuring consistent, optimal dosing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Reliability

If decontamination systems are applied in the form of gel or spray, then the materials can be easily applied, but the reproducibility of the decontamination phase is poor

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedecontamination reproducibilityVSAvoidapplication simplicity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The decontaminant coating is prepared in advance under controlled conditions with precise dosing and uniform distribution. This preliminary preparation ensures that every application of the support delivers the exact same amount and distribution of decontaminant, guaranteeing reproducible results while maintaining ease of operation through simple deployment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the physical state and delivery parameters of the decontaminant from liquid/spray form to a solid coating on a support. This parameter change enables precise control over dosage, distribution, and application consistency, thereby improving reproducibility while maintaining operational simplicity through the ready-to-deploy nature of the coated support.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If more decontaminating materials are applied to ensure sufficient coverage, then the decontamination effectiveness may improve, but the efficiency decreases due to overuse

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedecontamination effectivenessVSAvoiddecontamination efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent optimizes the concentration and distribution parameters of the decontaminant in the coating formulation. By precisely controlling these parameters during manufacturing, the coating delivers the exact amount needed for effective decontamination without excess, thereby maintaining high effectiveness while improving efficiency through reduced material consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The replacement of mechanical application systems with a pre-coated support eliminates the inefficiency of over-application. The controlled manufacturing process ensures that only the necessary amount of decontaminant is present on the support, delivering effective decontamination without the waste associated with mechanical spray or pulverization methods that require excess material to ensure coverage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The coating effectively traps and degrades toxic compounds, providing reliable and efficient decontamination with optimized material amounts, maintaining efficacy over time and simplifying handling and storage.

Implementation Method 1

the trapping layer being intended to be brought into contact with the toxic chemical compounds so as to trap them, for example by adsorption

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAdsorption: Adsorption

Implementation Method 2

the trapping layer being intended to be brought into contact with the toxic chemical compounds so as to trap them, for example by adsorption and/or by a chemical degradation reaction

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectChemical degradation reaction: Chemical Bonding

Data Source

PatentUS20250332461A1Coating for decontamination of toxic chemical compounds
Publication Date: 2025.10.30 HOWA STREETCARICO
  • US20250332461A1 patent drawing
  • US20250332461A1 patent drawing
  • US20250332461A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A decontamination coating and method for manufacturing the decontamination coating, wherein the decontamination coating includes a multilayer structure including a support, a trapping layer intended to be brought into contact with the toxic chemical compounds so as to trap them, and a holding film intended to maintain the shape of the support in the plane and in a direction transverse to the plane, during the formation of the trapping layer.