Super-Multilayer Cutting Tool Coating Against Peeling and Wear

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Surface-coated cutting tools often exhibit different damage morphologies across various portions, leading to reduced tool life and decreased working accuracy, as conventional techniques struggle to adequately address damages with distinct morphologies on multiple parts.

Innovation Solution

A surface-coated cutting tool with a super-multilayer-structure coating, where A and B layers of varying thicknesses, composed of elements like Ti, Al, Cr, Si, Ta, Nb, and W, and C, N, are alternately laminated from the base material to the surface, creating X and Y areas with specific thickness ratios to enhance oxidation resistance and hardness, thereby reducing interlayer peeling and extending tool life.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If conventional multilayer coatings with uniform layer thickness are used, then manufacturing simplicity is maintained, but the coating cannot adequately address different damage morphologies across various portions of the cutting tool

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveability to address different damage morphologiesVSAvoidcoating structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by creating two distinct types of multilayer structures (first and second multilayer structures) with different layer thickness ratios. The first multilayer structure has a thickness ratio of 3:1 or greater between alternate layers, while the second has a ratio of 1:3 or greater. This allows different regions of the coating to have optimized properties for different damage types, enabling the coating to address various damage morphologies across different portions of the cutting tool surface.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Reliability

If multilayer structures with varied thickness ratios are implemented, then oxidation resistance and hardness are enhanced, but the risk of interlayer peeling increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoxidation resistance and hardnessVSAvoidinterlayer adhesion
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements local quality by alternating between first multilayer structures with high thickness ratios (3:1 or greater) that provide enhanced oxidation resistance and hardness, and second multilayer structures with inverted thickness ratios (1:3 or greater) that serve as transition zones. This local differentiation allows each region to optimize for its specific function while maintaining overall coating integrity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies periodic action by repeating the alternating sequence of first and second multilayer structures throughout the coating thickness. This periodic alternation between high-ratio and low-ratio structures creates a rhythm of hard/oxidation-resistant zones followed by flexible transition zones, which periodically reinforces the coating while preventing stress accumulation that would lead to interlayer peeling.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

3Duration of action of stationary object

If single-layer or simple multilayer coatings are used, then manufacturing process is simple, but tool life is reduced due to inability to prevent multiple damage types

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetool lifeVSAvoidcoating layer structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Duration of action of stationary objectVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses local quality to create spatially differentiated coating regions with distinct thickness ratios optimized for different protection needs. The first multilayer structures with 3:1 or greater ratios provide enhanced protection against oxidation and wear, while the second multilayer structures with 1:3 or greater ratios provide flexibility and stress relief. This local optimization throughout the coating extends tool life by addressing multiple damage mechanisms simultaneously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements composite materials by combining multiple types of ceramic or ceramic-like layers with different compositions and thickness ratios within a single coating system. The first and second multilayer structures use different thickness distributions of the same or different material compositions, creating a composite structure that leverages the strengths of each configuration to resist various damage types, thereby extending tool life.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Data Source

PatentUS11059105B2Surface-coated cutting tool
Publication Date: 2021.07.13 SUMITOMO ELECTRIC HARDMETAL CORP
  • US11059105B2 patent drawing
  • US11059105B2 patent drawing
  • US11059105B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Provided is a surface-coated cutting tool including a base material and a coating including a super-multilayer-structure layer where A layers and B layers different from the A layers in composition are alternately laminated. The super-multilayer-structure layer includes an X area and a Y area those are alternately repeated. In the X area, A layers having a thickness AX and B layers having a thickness BX are alternately laminated. In the Y area, A layers having a thickness AY and B layers having a thickness BY are alternately laminated. The thickness AX is larger than the thickness AY, and the thickness BX is smaller than the thickness BY. Each of the A layers and the B layers comprising one or more elements selected from a group consisting of Ti, Al, Cr, Si, Ta, Nb, and W, and one or more elements selected from a group consisting of C and N.