Multi-Layer TPU-EVA Films Balancing Cost, Clarity, and Conformability

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing surface protection films face issues with high cost, compromised optical and gloss features, poor conformability, and environmental impact, particularly due to the use of thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU) and halogen-containing alternatives.

Innovation Solution

A multi-layer film structure comprising first and second thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU) layers with an intermediate ethylene vinyl acetate (EVA) layer, which is cost-effective, environmentally friendly, and maintains superior performance with enhanced abrasion and impact resistance, tailored for various applications.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If conventional monolayer TPU films are used for surface protection, then good optical clarity and gloss are achieved, but manufacturing cost increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing costVSAvoidoptical clarity and gloss
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The film is divided into multiple functional layers: an outer TPU layer (0.5-2.0 mil) that provides optical clarity, gloss, and protection, and an inner EVA layer (1.0-4.0 mil) that provides conformability and cushioning. This segmentation allows each layer to optimize its specific function while reducing overall material cost compared to monolayer TPU films.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The invention uses a composite structure combining TPU and EVA materials. The TPU layer contributes optical properties and durability, while the EVA layer contributes flexibility and conformability. This composite approach achieves superior overall performance at lower cost than pure TPU monolayer films.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Ease of manufacture

If alternative materials to TPU are used to reduce cost, then manufacturing cost decreases, but conformability and flexibility deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing costVSAvoidconformability and flexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

Different regions of the film structure have different properties optimized for their specific functions. The inner EVA layer provides high conformability and flexibility for installation on curved surfaces, while the outer TPU layer provides optical quality and protection. This local quality differentiation resolves the contradiction between cost and conformability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The composite TPU/EVA structure allows the EVA layer to provide the required conformability and flexibility at lower cost, while the TPU layer maintains optical properties. Together they achieve performance superior to alternative single-material films.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

3Ease of manufacture

If alternative materials to TPU are used to reduce cost, then manufacturing cost decreases, but optical clarity and gloss are compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing costVSAvoidoptical clarity and gloss
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The film structure segments optical functions from structural functions. The thin outer TPU layer (0.5-2.0 mil) is specifically designed to provide optical clarity and gloss, while the thicker inner EVA layer provides structural support and conformability. This segmentation allows cost reduction in the bulk material while preserving optical quality at the surface.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The composite structure uses TPU's superior optical properties at the outer layer while using cost-effective EVA for the inner layer. This achieves both cost reduction and maintenance of optical clarity and gloss that would be difficult to achieve with alternative materials alone.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

4Ease of manufacture

If halogen-containing alternatives to TPU are used, then manufacturing cost decreases, but environmental harm increases due to corrosion

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing costVSAvoidcorrosion of metal surfaces
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The invention uses cost-effective EVA material that is environmentally benign and does not contain halogens or corrosive substances. While EVA may have different long-term durability characteristics compared to TPU, it provides sufficient protection for the application and eliminates harmful corrosion effects on metal surfaces.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

Solution Approach 2:

The invention converts the potential harm of using cheap alternative materials (which often contain halogens) into a benefit by selecting EVA, a cost-effective material that is environmentally friendly and non-corrosive. The composite TPU/EVA structure maintains performance while eliminating harmful effects.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

Data Source

PatentUS20250250459A1Multi-layer surface proteciton films and methods for making the same
Publication Date: 2025.08.07 DELSTAR TECHNOLOGIES INC
  • US20250250459A1 patent drawing
  • US20250250459A1 patent drawing
  • US20250250459A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Multi-layer surface protection films and methods for making and using such films are provided. The surface protection films have first and second thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU) layers and an intermediate ethylene vinyl acetate (EVA) layer positioned between the first and second TPU layers. The use of first and second TPU layers as outer layers aids in the optical clarity of the film. The TPU layers may have different thicknesses. The use of EVA as a component of the film layers provides a lower cost film, as compared to conventional monolayer TPU films. The EVA component properties and overall ratio of EVA in the film can be used to modify physical properties of the multi-layer structure, while maintaining equivalent or superior performance to these films when used as a coating for surfaces on a wide range of applications, such as automobiles, wind turbine blades, appliances, electronic displays, mobile devices, and the like.