Multilayered Al-Mn Alloy Grain Size Control via Single-Bath Electrodeposition

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current nanostructured materials do not simultaneously optimize strength, strain rate sensitivity, ductility, and toughness, as different grain sizes are required for each property, making it challenging to achieve these properties together in a single material.

Innovation Solution

A single-bath electrodeposition process using galvanostatic or potentiostatic control to produce multilayered alloys with controlled grain sizes and compositions, allowing for the creation of complex shapes with varying layer thicknesses and grain structures, enabling the combination of multiple desirable properties in a single material.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If a uniform grain size of about 10 nm is used in nanostructured face centered cubic materials, then strength and rate sensitivity are optimized, but strain hardening capacity and toughness are not optimized

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovestrengthVSAvoidstrain hardening capacity
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The material is segmented into multiple layers with different grain sizes (e.g., fine-grained layers with 10 nm grains for strength and coarse-grained layers with larger grains for strain hardening). This segmentation allows each layer to contribute its optimal properties to the overall material performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different regions of the material are given different grain size characteristics - fine grains in some layers for strength and coarse grains in other layers for ductility and strain hardening. This local differentiation of properties resolves the contradiction between strength and strain hardening capacity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Reliability

If nanocrystalline grains are used, then fatigue crack initiation is slowed, but fatigue crack propagation is detrimental

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefatigue crack initiation resistanceVSAvoidfatigue crack propagation resistance
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The material structure is segmented into nanocrystalline layers (for crack initiation resistance) and coarser-grained layers (for crack propagation resistance). This creates a hierarchical structure where each scale addresses different fatigue mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a composite microstructure combining nanocrystalline and coarse-grained regions within the same material. This composite approach allows the material to exhibit both fatigue crack initiation resistance (from nanograins) and crack propagation resistance (from coarser grains).

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

3Adaptability or versatility

If multilayered structures with varying grain sizes are created, then multiple properties are optimized, but manufacturing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproperty optimizationVSAvoidmanufacturing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Multiple deposition processes that would otherwise require separate manufacturing steps are merged into a single electrodeposition bath. The multilayered structure with varying grain sizes is created in one continuous process by controlling deposition parameters, reducing manufacturing complexity while maintaining property optimization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses parameter changes (current density, potential, temperature, composition) during electrodeposition to control grain size and layer formation. By dynamically adjusting these parameters during a single deposition process, complex multilayered structures are achieved without proportionally increasing manufacturing complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enables the production of materials with balanced properties such as high strength, ductility, and toughness by controlling grain size and layer thickness, resulting in materials with enhanced mechanical properties like increased hardness and specific strength exceeding commercial engineering alloys.

Implementation Method 1

A single-bath electrodeposition process is disclosed herein, which is a versatile, economical, and scalable route to produce complex shapes.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrodeposition: Electrodeposition

Implementation Method 2

During electrodeposition in a properly designed system, deposition is made in layers. Composition modulation from one layer to the next is obtained using galvanostatic or potentiostatic control.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrolysis: Electrolysis

Implementation Method 3

Composition modulation from one layer to the next is obtained using galvanostatic or potentiostatic control.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGalvanostatic control:

Implementation Method 4

Composition modulation from one layer to the next is obtained using galvanostatic or potentiostatic control.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPotentiostatic control:

Data Source

PatentUS9783907B2Tuning nano-scale grain size distribution in multilayered alloys electrodeposited using ionic solutions, including Al—Mn and similar alloys
Publication Date: 2017.10.10 MASSACHUSETTS INST OF TECH
  • US9783907B2 patent drawing
  • US9783907B2 patent drawing
  • US9783907B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Al—Mnx/Al—Mny multilayers with a wide range of structures ranging from microcrystalline to nanocrystalline and amorphous were electrodeposited using a single bath method under galvanostatic control from room temperature ionic liquid. By varying the Mn composition by −1-3 at. % between layers, the grain sizes in one material can be systematically modulated between two values. For example, one specimen alternates between grain sizes of about 21 and 52 nm, in an alloy of average composition of 10.3 at. % Mn. Nanoindentation testing revealed multilayers with finer grains and higher Mn content exhibited better resistance to plastic deformation. Other alloy systems also are expected to be electrodeposited under similar circumstances.