Multi-Level Cargo Facility Vertical Stacking

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current air cargo facilities face operational bottlenecks and inefficiencies due to outdated infrastructure, land constraints, and inadequate security systems, struggling to keep pace with growing cargo volumes and modern transportation demands.

Innovation Solution

A multi-tenant, multi-user, multi-airline cargo consolidation and processing center with a high-security, multi-level structure that integrates secure landside and airside operations, automated storage and retrieval systems, and advanced data monitoring for efficient cargo tracking and security, allowing for increased throughput and reduced footprints.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If traditional single-story cargo facilities are used, then construction is simpler and operations are easier, but land use efficiency is low and cargo throughput capacity is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecargo throughput capacityVSAvoidfacility footprint area
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transitions from horizontal single-story cargo facilities to vertical multi-level structures. The cargo facility includes multiple floors stacked vertically, with each floor serving different cargo processing functions. This dimensional change allows the system to process greater cargo volumes without expanding the ground footprint, directly resolving the contradiction between throughput capacity and land area usage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Area of stationary object

If cargo facility footprint area is reduced to constrain land use, then land efficiency improves, but cargo processing capacity may be limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefacility footprint areaVSAvoidcargo processing capacity
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

By stacking cargo processing operations across multiple vertical levels, the system achieves high cargo processing capacity within a compact ground footprint. The multi-level structure with automated conveyors and transfer mechanisms enables substantial throughput without requiring expansive horizontal space.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces traditional mechanical cargo handling systems with automated conveyor belts, automated storage and retrieval systems, and robotic manipulation. These automated systems enable efficient cargo movement between levels and processing zones, maintaining high processing capacity while minimizing the physical space required for operational infrastructure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Reliability

If outdated infrastructure is used, then construction and operation costs are lower, but operational efficiency and security are insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecargo securityVSAvoidfacility infrastructure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual and mechanical security systems with automated surveillance, biometric access control, and integrated security monitoring networks. These modern systems provide superior cargo security and threat detection capabilities while managing infrastructure complexity through centralized control and standardized implementations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The facility integrates multiple functions within a unified structure: cargo reception, security screening, automated storage, robotic processing, and dispatch all occur within the same multi-level facility. This multi-functionality approach consolidates infrastructure requirements while maintaining high security standards across all operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Productivity

If manual cargo handling processes are used, then operational flexibility is higher, but processing speed and labor efficiency are lower

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecargo processing speedVSAvoidautomated system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual cargo handling with automated robotic systems including robotic arms for cargo manipulation, automated guided vehicles for transport, and computer vision systems for identification and routing. These systems dramatically increase processing speed while managing complexity through integrated control software and standardized interfaces.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The automated system incorporates self-regulating mechanisms where cargo automatically triggers sensors, which then initiate appropriate handling sequences without human intervention. The system self-monitors its own performance, adjusts operational parameters, and maintains optimal processing speeds through feedback control, reducing the complexity burden.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS10210477B2Multi-tenant multi-user multi-airline cargo consolidation and processing center
Publication Date: 2019.02.19 FACTOR RONALD D
  • US10210477B2 patent drawing
  • US10210477B2 patent drawing
  • US10210477B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A multi-tenant multi-user multi-airline cargo consolidation and processing center for processing cargo with an enclosed high security small footprint multi-level structure operably connected to an airport. The center having a plurality of secure floors, each secure floor with a secure landside cargo acceptance and delivery area for receiving cargo, a security inspection zone, and an automatic storage and retrieval system zone. The secure floors connect to a cargo build up/break down area via a floor connection mechanism. A transfer vehicle unit load device area and a government agency zone can be used for moving and clearing the cargo. The center can have a plurality of landside entry/exit areas, one for each secure floor and an airside entry/exit area. Scanners connected to a network, reading data devices on the cargo can connect with computers and scheduling models to automate the cargo movement process.