Multilevel Thermopile Fire Detection for Low-Power Wildfire Monitoring

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing wildland fire detection systems, particularly infrared (IR) cameras, are costly, energy-intensive, and vulnerable to outdoor conditions, limiting their deployment and sensitivity to distant fires due to attenuation and interference from human and animal IR emissions, while thermopiles are dismissed for outdoor use due to slow response times and junction failure concerns.

Innovation Solution

A Multilevel Fire Detector (MFD) system utilizing thermopiles oriented in multiple directions, combined with sensor fusion algorithms and directional sensors, to enhance signal detection and noise reduction, allowing for low-cost, resilient fire detection beyond line-of-sight.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If IR cameras are used for wildland fire detection, then detection sensitivity and imaging capability are improved, but cost, energy consumption, and operational complexity increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection sensitivityVSAvoidoperational complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces expensive, complex IR cameras with inexpensive thermopile sensors that can be deployed in large numbers. Individual thermopile sensors are simple, low-cost components that don't require complex cooling systems or expensive infrastructure, enabling widespread deployment across wildland areas.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent divides the detection system into multiple distributed thermopile sensors rather than using a single complex IR camera. Each sensor operates independently and contributes to the overall detection capability, allowing the system to achieve comprehensive coverage through multiple simple units rather than one complex unit.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Area of stationary object

If multiple IR cameras are deployed to cover larger areas, then detection coverage is improved, but cost and energy consumption increase proportionally

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection coverageVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSUse of energy by stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses numerous inexpensive thermopile sensors instead of expensive IR cameras, enabling dense deployment across large areas without proportional increases in energy consumption. Each thermopile sensor consumes minimal power compared to IR cameras, allowing the system to achieve extensive coverage energy-efficiently.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent segments the detection system into multiple low-power thermopile sensors distributed across the monitoring area. This segmentation allows the system to cover large areas by combining the outputs of many energy-efficient sensors rather than using fewer high-consumption cameras.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Use of energy by stationary object

If thermopiles are used for fire detection, then cost and energy efficiency are improved, but response time and reliability are worsened due to slow response and junction failure

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy efficiencyVSAvoidresponse time
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by stationary objectVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the detection function across multiple thermopile sensors oriented in different directions. Each sensor has a simple, reliable structure without complex moving parts or cooling systems, improving overall system reliability. The segmented architecture allows the system to achieve fast effective response by processing signals from multiple sensors simultaneously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent adds the dimension of multi-directional sensing to the thermopile sensors, with sensors oriented at different angles to detect fire from various directions. This dimensional approach compensates for the slow response of individual sensors by providing redundant detection paths and improving overall system response time through parallel monitoring.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

4Length of stationary object

If IR cameras are used, then line-of-sight detection is achieved, but detection beyond line-of-sight and through obstacles is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection rangeVSAvoidline-of-sight limitation
Core Design Contradiction:
Length of stationary objectVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses multiple thermopile sensors positioned and oriented to detect thermal radiation from different directions and paths. This segmented approach allows the system to detect fires beyond direct line-of-sight by accumulating thermal signals from multiple sensing angles, effectively penetrating obstacles that would block a single camera's view.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transitions from single-direction line-of-sight detection to multi-dimensional thermal radiation detection. By arranging thermopile sensors in various orientations and positions, the system detects thermal energy from multiple spatial dimensions, enabling detection beyond line-of-sight limitations and through obstacles that would block direct visual paths.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The MFD system provides robust, energy-efficient fire detection up to 10 miles with reduced root mean square error, enabling widespread deployment and accurate fire risk assessment without continuous data streaming, overcoming the limitations of traditional IR cameras.

Implementation Method 1

A Multilevel Fire Detector (MFD) system utilizing thermopiles oriented in multiple directions

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermopile: Thermopile

Implementation Method 2

Their bodies are equipped with infrared (IR) receptors... M. acuminata's sensilla contain Zinc phosphide proteins sensitive to IR

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal radiation: Thermal Radiation

Data Source

PatentUS12424068B2Multilevel fire detector
Publication Date: 2025.09.23 COYLE BRIAN MICHAEL
  • US12424068B2 patent drawing
  • US12424068B2 patent drawing
  • US12424068B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A multilevel fire detector system includes a vessel with low-cost thermoelectric sensors such as thermopiles, facing multiple directions, that amplify infrared (IR) wavelengths particular to wildfire. A controller processes and compares IR data patterns in various ways and determines if potential fire risk or heat surges exceeds a threshold, which is a function of on-board and external data, then produces a warning signal transmitted by a communication system. The system may be deployed on its own, or configured with infrastructure, including transmission lines implicated in wildfires.