Multi-Line Production Scheduling With Grade Transition Cost Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In industries with high material complexity, such as the chemical, pharmaceutical, and coating industries, grade transitions incur significant costs due to product characteristic differences, leading to inefficiencies in production scheduling that result in increased inventory and late deliveries.

Innovation Solution

A production scheduling method and system that calculates a production cycle indicator, considers production process direction, and evaluates grade transition costs to optimize the scheduling of work orders across multiple production lines, ensuring efficient use of production resources and reducing finished product inventory.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If production is scheduled early to anticipate demand, then delivery timing is improved, but inventory loads and losses increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedelivery timingVSAvoidinventory loads
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary scheduling actions by calculating production cycle indicators and sorting work orders based on delivery dates, production cycle days, and grade transition costs. This allows the system to determine optimal production timing in advance without simply producing early, thereby balancing delivery reliability with inventory reduction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the parameter of production timing by introducing a production cycle indicator that combines delivery date, production cycle days, and grade transition cost. This parameter transformation enables dynamic scheduling adjustments that optimize both delivery timing and inventory levels rather than using fixed early production schedules.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Quantity of substance

If production is delayed to reduce inventory, then inventory losses are reduced, but late deliveries occur

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveinventoryVSAvoiddelivery timing
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses feedback mechanisms by continuously monitoring delivery dates, production cycle days, and grade transition costs to dynamically adjust work order scheduling. This feedback loop ensures that production timing is optimized based on actual demand patterns and cost considerations, preventing both excessive inventory and late deliveries.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces dynamics to the scheduling process by making work order priority dynamic rather than static. The production cycle indicator and sorting mechanism allow the system to adapt scheduling decisions based on current production line status, demand patterns, and cost factors, enabling flexible response to changing conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Adaptability or versatility

If grade transitions are performed frequently to meet diverse product demands, then adaptability is improved, but changeover costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduct demand flexibilityVSAvoidchangeover cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The system changes the parameter of work order selection by incorporating grade transition cost into the production cycle indicator calculation. This parameter transformation allows the system to evaluate and minimize changeover costs while still meeting diverse product demands, finding an optimal balance between adaptability and cost efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The production cycle indicator serves as an intermediary that mediates between the conflicting requirements of product demand flexibility and changeover cost minimization. By sorting work orders based on this indicator, the system finds intermediate scheduling solutions that balance adaptability with cost efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Quantity of substance

If production scheduling is optimized to reduce inventory, then inventory costs are reduced, but scheduling complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefinished product inventoryVSAvoidscheduling system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system manages scheduling complexity by transforming multiple scheduling parameters (delivery date, production cycle days, grade transition cost) into a single production cycle indicator. This parameter transformation simplifies the decision-making process while still achieving inventory reduction goals, avoiding the need for complex multi-parameter optimization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system segments the scheduling process into distinct steps: reading work order data and production line status, calculating production cycle indicators, sorting work orders, and selecting optimal work orders. This segmentation makes the complex scheduling task more manageable and computationally efficient.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS20250225458A1Production scheduling method and production management system
Publication Date: 2025.07.10 IND TECH RES INST
  • US20250225458A1 patent drawing
  • US20250225458A1 patent drawing
  • US20250225458A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A production scheduling method including: reading work order data and production line status data of each of multiple production lines; identifying a target to-be-scheduled production line according to the production line status data; selecting one or more to-be-scheduled work orders; calculating a production cycle indicator of each of the to-be-scheduled work orders according to a production cycle days, a scheduling date, and a delivery date of the each of the to-be-scheduled work orders; sorting the one or more to-be-scheduled work orders to schedule a first-order target to-be-scheduled work order to the target to-be-scheduled production line for production according to the production cycle indicator, a production process direction, and grade transition cost.