Multilingual Course Mapping for Transferable Literacy Skills

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing digital instruction technologies are unable to seamlessly transfer skills and courses across regional and global educational jurisdictions, failing to account for linguistic diversity and varying educational standards, which hinders the development of multiliteracy in students.

Innovation Solution

A multi-lingual toggle system with integrated architecture that supports transferable skills and course mapping, utilizing an item response theory psychometric model to validate learning progressions and identify transferable skills across languages, and a user interface that facilitates translanguaging, enabling dynamic switching between languages for personalized learning.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If existing digital instruction technologies are used, then digital instruction delivery is possible, but seamless transfer of skills and courses across regional and global educational jurisdictions cannot be achieved

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransferability of skills and courses across jurisdictionsVSAvoidaccounting for linguistic diversity and educational standards
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system creates a universal framework that maps educational content across multiple jurisdictions and languages. The course mapping engine and skill transfer framework enable a single educational resource to serve multiple educational systems simultaneously, adapting to different linguistic and curricular requirements through standardized mapping protocols.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces intermediary components including a course mapping engine, skill transfer framework, and language toggle interface that mediate between different educational jurisdictions. These intermediaries translate and adapt content between languages and curricula, enabling seamless transfer while maintaining accountability to local educational standards.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Adaptability or versatility

If educational content is localized for different languages and regions, then linguistic diversity is respected, but complexity of course mapping and skill transfer increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesupport for multiple languages and curriculaVSAvoidsystem architecture for course mapping and skill transfer
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the complex task of cross-jurisdictional content transfer into distinct functional modules: language toggle interface, course mapping engine, skill transfer framework, and learning progression validation. Each module handles a specific aspect of the translation and adaptation process, reducing overall system complexity while maintaining comprehensive multilingual support.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system employs dynamic language toggling and adaptive course mapping that adjusts to user preferences and educational jurisdiction requirements in real-time. The language toggle interface dynamically switches content presentation, while the course mapping engine dynamically adjusts skill transfer pathways based on the target curriculum standards.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Productivity

If traditional monolingual education systems are used, then instructional simplicity is maintained, but development of multiliteracy in students is hindered

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestudent multiliteracy acquisitionVSAvoidteaching time for multiple languages
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary validation of learning progressions using item response theory psychometric models to identify transferable skills before actual instruction occurs. This preliminary analysis pre-maps skill equivalencies across languages, so that when students learn in one language, the system has already prepared the corresponding skill recognition frameworks for other languages, eliminating redundant teaching time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements continuous feedback loops that track student learning progressions across multiple languages. The learning progression validation mechanism provides real-time feedback on skill acquisition, allowing the system to adjust instruction and recognize transferable skills dynamically, optimizing teaching time while ensuring comprehensive multiliteracy development.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS12482369B2Multi-lingual toggle system with transferable skills, course mapping and translanguaging capabilities across global and regional educational jurisdictions
Publication Date: 2025.11.25 RENAISSANCE LEARNING INC
  • US12482369B2 patent drawing
  • US12482369B2 patent drawing
  • US12482369B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A multi-lingual toggle (“MLT”) system with transferable skills, course mapping and tranlanguaging capabilities across educational content from different regional and global jurisdictions is disclosed. The MLT system tracks student holistic and longitudinal growth towards developing a multiliterate brain and supports literacy education in multiple languages. The MLT system includes learning progression routines developed authentically to reflect literacy acquisition in the target language. The learning progressions are empirically validated through the application of an item response theory (“IRT”) psychometric model to compute the difficulty of the skills associated with the learning progressions. There is a strong relationship between the ordering of the skills and the associated difficulties that presents an opportunity to create multilingual literacy trajectories that highlight how multilingual students achieve multiliteracy holistically, rather than in a monolingual sense. A key component is the identification and reporting of transferable skills between languages (e.g., English and Spanish) and a variant model allows learning objectives and associated data to be tracked across languages.