Multi-Link Setup Restriction for Low-Latency Service Isolation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In wireless communication systems, particularly in the 802.11be standard, there is a challenge in preventing low-latency services on 'clean links' from being interfered by non-low-latency services, as existing methods fail to effectively isolate these services during multi-link communication.

Innovation Solution

The proposed solution involves generating a frame with a supported rates and BSS membership selectors element that indicates a non-AP MLD is disallowed to initiate multi-link setup on a clean link, and using a QoS map element to differentiate between low-latency and non-low-latency services by setting specific DSCP ranges, ensuring only low-latency services are mapped to certain TIDs, thereby preventing interference.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If multi-link setup is allowed on clean links, then link utilization and service diversity are improved, but low-latency service reliability deteriorates due to interference from non-low-latency services

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelink utilizationVSAvoidlow-latency service reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the service types into low-latency services and non-low-latency services, and segments the links into clean links and non-clean links. Clean links are exclusively allocated for low-latency services, while non-clean links can carry both service types. This segmentation prevents interference from non-low-latency services on clean links, ensuring low-latency service reliability while maintaining overall link utilization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies different quality requirements to different links based on their designated purposes. Clean links are configured with strict quality control to carry only low-latency services, while non-clean links have more flexible quality requirements. This local quality differentiation ensures that critical low-latency services receive the necessary reliability guarantees without compromising overall network productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Adaptability or versatility

If all TIDs are allowed on all links, then service flexibility and link adaptability are improved, but service isolation and quality control worsen

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveservice flexibilityVSAvoidservice isolation
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the TID-to-link mapping based on service types. For clean links, only TIDs corresponding to low-latency services are permitted to map, while non-clean links allow TIDs for both low-latency and non-low-latency services. This segmentation maintains service flexibility through TID-to-link mapping while ensuring service isolation by restricting which TIDs can access clean links.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different mapping rules are applied to different links according to their specific requirements. Clean links enforce strict mapping rules that allow only low-latency service TIDs, while non-clean links apply more permissive mapping rules. This local quality approach preserves overall service flexibility while achieving necessary service isolation on critical links.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Reliability

If clean links are established for low-latency services, then service quality and interference prevention are improved, but system complexity and configuration difficulty worsen

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveservice qualityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the link configuration into clean and non-clean categories, with clear definitions and rules for each type. This segmentation simplifies the configuration process by providing a straightforward classification mechanism, reducing system complexity despite the presence of differentiated service requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies quality differentiation locally at the link level rather than requiring complex global configuration. Each link is independently configured as clean or non-clean with corresponding TID mapping rules, which simplifies the overall system complexity by breaking down the configuration into manageable, localized decisions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS20240298247A1Multi-Link Communication Method, Apparatus, and Readable Storage Medium
Publication Date: 2024.09.05 HUAWEI TECH CO LTD
  • US20240298247A1 patent drawing
  • US20240298247A1 patent drawing
  • US20240298247A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A multi-link communication method is implemented by an access point (AP) multi-link device (MLD). The multi-link communication method includes generating a first frame, and sending the first frame on a first link. The first frame includes a supported rates and a basic service set (BSS) membership selectors element, the element includes first indication information, and the first indication information indicates that a non-AP MLD is disallowed to initiate multi-link setup with the AP MLD on the first link.