Multi-Material 3D Printed Injection Mold for Thermal Management

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

3D printed injection molds lack the necessary heat resistance, thermal conductivity, toughness, and abrasion resistance to effectively sustain high temperatures and pressures over thousands of injection cycles, limiting their use in large-scale production.

Innovation Solution

A multi-material mold is constructed using additive manufacturing, with defined sub-regions of heat conductive and non-conductive materials, including polymeric ink for heat dissipation, and embedded heat sinks, along with flexible and abrasion-resistant materials to enhance thermal conductivity and durability.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If standard metallic materials are used for injection molds, then heat resistance, thermal conductivity, toughness, and abrasion resistance are improved, but manufacturing cost and production time increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveheat resistanceVSAvoidmanufacturing cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the material parameters by using polymer-based materials with modified thermal and mechanical properties through additive manufacturing, replacing traditional metallic materials to reduce cost while maintaining functional performance

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs composite material structures combining polymer matrices with reinforcing fillers or multi-layer configurations to achieve the necessary heat resistance, thermal conductivity, and mechanical strength without using expensive metals

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Reliability

If standard metallic materials are used for injection molds, then heat resistance, thermal conductivity, toughness, and abrasion resistance are improved, but manufacturing time increases to weeks

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveheat resistanceVSAvoidmanufacturing time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transforms the manufacturing approach by using additive manufacturing processes that can produce molds in hours rather than weeks, fundamentally changing the production time parameter while maintaining material performance through polymer composite formulations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces traditional mechanical subtractive manufacturing methods with additive manufacturing technology, enabling rapid prototyping and production of injection molds without extensive machining time

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Productivity

If polymer materials are used in 3D printing technologies, then manufacturing speed and cost are improved, but heat resistance, thermal conductivity, toughness, and abrasion resistance deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprinting speedVSAvoidheat resistance
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent resolves this contradiction by developing composite polymer materials that incorporate thermally conductive fillers, reinforcement fibers, or multi-layer structures to enhance heat resistance and mechanical properties while maintaining the manufacturing advantages of polymer-based 3D printing

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies local quality enhancement by using multi-material or functionally graded polymer composites where specific regions have optimized thermal and mechanical properties to meet the demanding requirements of injection molding applications

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

4Ease of manufacture

If polymer materials are used in 3D printing technologies, then manufacturing cost is reduced, but durability and lifespan deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing costVSAvoidlifespan
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSDuration of action of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extends polymer mold lifespan by incorporating durable reinforcing materials, wear-resistant fillers, and structurally optimized composite formulations that maintain mechanical integrity over thousands of injection cycles while keeping costs low

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Solution Approach 2:

The patent may use segmented or modular mold designs where high-wear components can be replaced or maintained independently, extending the overall mold lifespan through targeted maintenance of critical regions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The multi-material mold provides improved heat dissipation, increased durability, and extended lifespan, enabling its use in high-pressure and high-temperature injection molding processes, even for low-volume production and prototype applications.

Implementation Method 1

a first of the sub-regions comprises an internal sub-region that allows dissipation of heat accumulating during use of the mold, the associated first sub-region specific material being a heat conductive material

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeat conduction: Conduction (thermal)

Implementation Method 2

a second of the sub-regions comprising an embedded heat sink sub-region for conducting heat away from the internal sub-region allowing dissipation

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeat sink: Heat Sink

Data Source

PatentEP3344427B13-d printed mold for injection molding
Publication Date: 2020.03.25 STRATASYS LTD
  • EP3344427B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3344427B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3344427B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A multi-material mold and a method of constructing a multi-material mold for injection molding using additive manufacturing comprises defining a structure of the mold; and defining at least two sub-regions, associating the sub-regions with respective specific materials and printing the sub-regions with the specific material. The sub- regions may include an internal sub-region that allows dissipation of heat accumulating during use of the mold, where the specific material is heat conductive; an embedded heat sink sub-region for conducting heat away from the internal sub-region allowing dissipation, where the specific material is relatively non-conductive mold material embedded with lines or layers of relatively heat-conductive material; a sub-region resistant to abrasion, where the specific material is an abrasion-resistant polymer; a sub- region resistant to breaking under process conditions, where the specific material is a high toughness and high Tg polymer or a digital material and a sub-region of flexible material for sealing and releasing.