Multi-Material Spring Structure for Flexible Joints With Smooth Surfaces

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing flexible, non-load bearing joints and cylindrical structural columns fail to simultaneously maintain mechanical rigidity and allow for large global displacements while preserving a smooth outer surface, especially under changing configurations and load conditions.

Innovation Solution

A flexible multi-material structure comprising a spring skeleton with repeating cells filled with infill materials, such as foamed or monolithic elastomers, where the spring skeleton can be made of steel and polycarbonate blends, and the infill materials include silicones or polyurethane, with a Poisson ratio of 0.1 to 0.3, providing a balance of radial and torsional stiffness.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Length of moving object

If a monolithic flexible structure is used, then large global displacements are allowed, but mechanical rigidity and radial stiffness are insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveglobal displacementVSAvoidmechanical rigidity
Core Design Contradiction:
Length of moving objectVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The invention uses a composite structure combining a flexible outer elastomeric material with an embedded stiff spring skeleton. The elastomer allows large global displacements and bending, while the spring skeleton provides radial stiffness and mechanical strength. This composite approach resolves the contradiction by integrating materials with complementary properties.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Solution Approach 2:

The structure implements local quality by having different regions with different stiffness characteristics. The outer elastomeric surface provides flexibility for large displacements, while the embedded spring skeleton in specific locations provides radial stiffness. The spring cells are strategically positioned to provide stiffness where needed while allowing flexibility elsewhere.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Length of moving object

If a flexible structure is used, then large global displacements are allowed, but the outer surface smoothness deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveglobal displacementVSAvoidouter surface smoothness
Core Design Contradiction:
Length of moving objectVSShape

Solution Approach 1:

The invention uses a flexible elastomeric outer shell that maintains surface smoothness while allowing large global displacements. The continuous elastomeric surface acts as a smooth skin over the internal spring skeleton, preventing surface irregularities during articulation and bending.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #30Flexible shells and thin films

Solution Approach 2:

The composite of elastomer and spring skeleton allows the smooth elastomeric surface to carry the bending deformation while the internal skeleton maintains structural integrity, preventing surface buckling or wrinkling during large displacements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

3Strength

If radial stiffness is increased, then radial displacement is prevented, but bending flexibility is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveradial stiffnessVSAvoidbending flexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSLength of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The spring skeleton is positioned and oriented to provide radial stiffness in the radial direction while allowing bending flexibility in the tangential direction. The cellular structure of the springs creates anisotropic mechanical properties, being stiff radially but flexible for bending.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The elastomer-spring composite creates directional stiffness characteristics where the spring skeleton dominates radial response while the elastomer dominates bending response, achieving both radial stiffness and bending flexibility simultaneously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The structure effectively withstands loads and maintains a smooth surface during articulation, minimizing actuation energy and preventing radial displacement, while allowing for significant bending and torsional deformation without buckling, as validated by finite element analysis and experimental measurements.

Implementation Method 1

the Poisson ratio of the infill material may be about 0.1 to 0.3

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPoisson ratio: Poisson's Effect

Implementation Method 2

the infill material may consist of one or more of foamed and monolithic elastomers

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectViscoelasticity: Viscoelasticity

Implementation Method 3

a spring skeleton comprising a plurality of repeating cells

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Data Source

PatentUS12123470B1Flexible multi-material structures
Publication Date: 2024.10.22 THE GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES AS REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE
  • US12123470B1 patent drawing
  • US12123470B1 patent drawing
  • US12123470B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A flexible multi-material structure comprises a spring skeleton comprising a plurality of repeating cells, the cells filled with an infill material, wherein the spring skeleton is one of a machined spring structure and a wave spring structure. The spring skeleton may comprise one of steel and polycarbonate blends, and the infill material may consist of one or more of foamed and monolithic elastomers. The foamed and monolithic elastomers consist of one or more of silicones, polyether, and polyurethane. The Poisson ratio of the infill material is about 0.1 to 0.3. The repeating cells of the spring skeleton have a predetermined wall thickness (t), wall height (h), and revolution symmetry.