Multimedia Object Annotation via Context Role Assignment

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for annotating multimedia data, such as identifying individuals in digitized images, require manual interventions and cannot be automated, limiting efficiency and accuracy.

Innovation Solution

A computer-aided method that analyzes multimedia data to detect objects and assign them roles using context information, including visual, phonetic, and geometric characteristics, to automatically annotate the data without manual procedures.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Extent of automation

If manual procedures are used for annotating multimedia data, then identification accuracy can be maintained, but automation cannot be achieved and efficiency is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomation of annotationVSAvoidannotation time
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The annotation process is segmented into distinct automated stages: object detection in multimedia data, extraction of characteristics, comparison with database entries, and role assignment. This segmentation enables each stage to be handled automatically by specialized software components, achieving full automation while maintaining efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

A database serving as an intermediary stores pre-filed reference information about objects (particularly persons) including visual and phonetic characteristics. This intermediary database enables automated comparison and identification without requiring direct manual intervention, bridging the gap between raw multimedia data and annotated results.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Extent of automation

If face-recognition software is used to detect persons, then automatic detection is achieved, but identification fails when persons are not in the database

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomatic detectionVSAvoididentification reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system is designed to handle multiple scenarios universally: it can identify persons present in the database through comparison, detect persons not in the database through internet search, and process various types of objects beyond just persons. This multi-functionality ensures reliable operation regardless of whether target objects exist in predefined databases.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary actions by maintaining a database of reference information about known objects and conducting internet searches for additional reference data before final identification. This preliminary preparation of reference materials enables more reliable identification when objects are encountered in the multimedia data.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Reliability

If internet search is used to find manually annotated images, then identification can be achieved, but the process requires manual interventions and cannot be fully automated

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveidentification accuracyVSAvoidautomation level
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSExtent of automation

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs self-service by automatically conducting internet searches for annotated images, extracting characteristics from found images, comparing them with objects in the multimedia data, and completing the identification process without human intervention. The system serves itself by autonomously gathering and processing reference information needed for accurate identification.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Measurement precision

If comprehensive analysis is performed on all multimedia data, then annotation accuracy improves, but computational effort increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveannotation precisionVSAvoidcomputational effort
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies partial action by focusing analysis only on detected objects rather than processing all multimedia data uniformly. It extracts only the characteristics necessary for identification (visual and phonetic features) and compares only relevant data, achieving sufficient annotation precision without the computational overhead of comprehensive analysis of entire multimedia sequences.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS9020268B2Method and apparatus for annotating multimedia data in a computer-aided manner
Publication Date: 2015.04.28 VERKADA INC
  • US9020268B2 patent drawing
  • US9020268B2 patent drawing
  • US9020268B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Annotation of a sequence of digitized images in multimedia data is aided by a computer analyzing the multimedia data to identify one or more objects and assigning each object to a respective role. The role assignment is determined by processing context information representing a model of the multimedia data.