Multimedia Document Clustering via Hybrid Evolutionary Algorithms

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing multimedia indexing systems face challenges in iteratively improving clustering and ranking of documents, as traditional stochastic optimization techniques are limited in adapting to dynamic information fluctuations and workload redistribution in large-scale data sets across distributed networks.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of hybrid algorithms combining information retrieval methodologies with evolutionary computation search strategies, using stochastic optimization techniques to iteratively improve document clustering and ranking by applying mutation and recombination operators, and adjusting algorithm control parameters for continuous subclustering and indexing of multimedia documents across distributed systems.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If traditional stochastic optimization techniques are used for document clustering, then the basic clustering function is achieved, but the system cannot adapt to dynamic information fluctuations and workload redistribution in large-scale distributed data sets

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to dynamic information fluctuationsVSAvoidclustering quality stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic adaptation by allowing the evolutionary algorithm parameters (mutation rate, crossover rate, population size) to change automatically in response to system conditions. The system monitors information fluctuations and workload distribution, then adjusts optimization parameters dynamically to maintain effective clustering despite changing conditions in large-scale distributed data sets.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates feedback mechanisms where clustering performance metrics and workload distribution information are continuously monitored and fed back into the evolutionary optimization process. This feedback loop enables the algorithm to learn from past performance and adapt its search strategy to achieve more reliable and stable clustering results over time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Manufacturing precision

If iterative improvement of clustering is implemented using evolutionary computation, then document clustering quality improves, but computational effort and processing time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveclustering qualityVSAvoidcomputational processing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies partial action by implementing iterative improvement through a limited number of evolution generations rather than exhaustive search. The evolutionary algorithm stops when convergence criteria are met or time limits are reached, providing sufficient clustering quality without requiring complete enumeration of all possible cluster configurations, thus reducing computational time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts evolutionary computation parameters such as population size, mutation rate, and crossover probability based on problem complexity and time constraints. By optimizing these parameters adaptively, the system achieves high clustering quality while controlling computational effort and processing time within acceptable ranges.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Productivity

If hybrid algorithms combining information retrieval and evolutionary computation are used, then subclustering efficiency improves, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesubclustering efficiencyVSAvoidalgorithm complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges information retrieval methodologies with evolutionary computation search strategies to create a hybrid algorithm. The IR component handles document indexing and initial clustering, while the EC component performs optimization and refinement. This combination leverages the strengths of both approaches to improve subclustering efficiency in distributed systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The system segments the complex algorithm into distinct functional modules: an information retrieval module for initial document processing and indexing, and an evolutionary computation module for optimization. This segmentation allows each module to be developed, tested, and optimized independently, making the overall complex system more manageable and maintainable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS8825562B2Method for a system that indexes, ranks, and clusters multimedia documents
Publication Date: 2014.09.02 TAPICU INC
  • US8825562B2 patent drawing
  • US8825562B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for a system that indexes, ranks, and clusters multimedia documents using organizing means, scoring means, and stochastic means that optimizes parameter sets comprising of object parameters. The method creates a plurality of individual parameter sets, the parameter sets comprising information sharing system object parameters for describing a structures, search query sets, and dynamic search spaces to be optimized and setting the population of individuals as a population of memes. These parameters are required to filter, organize, and index any large-scale data set—information stored on a single computer, a local area network (LAN), and a wide area network (WAN) that encompasses the whole Internet—that may consists of constantly fluctuating information content over relatively short periods of time.