Multimedia Error Probability Annotation via User Distraction Monitoring

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Office workers often introduce errors into multimedia content due to distractions, which existing technologies fail to effectively address, as they are unable to reliably identify and annotate potential error locations in real-time based on user distraction levels.

Innovation Solution

A system and method that automatically determine the probability of errors in multimedia content by monitoring user states, sensitivity of content, and user profiles, using a function F(U,S,P) that incorporates machine learning algorithms to annotate distractions through visual, auditory, or haptic feedback, such as color changes, audio, or textures, indicating areas prone to errors.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If real-time monitoring of user state is implemented to identify error locations, then manufacturing precision of content creation is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontent creation accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the content creation process into monitorable units by tracking user interactions with specific elements (text, images, videos) and annotating individual locations with error probabilities. This allows precision monitoring without requiring complete system overhaul.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary annotation layer that sits between the user interface and the content. This layer captures user state information and distraction indicators without fundamentally changing the core application architecture, thus improving precision while limiting complexity increase.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If multiple monitoring parameters (user state, sensitivity, profile) are integrated to calculate error probability, then reliability of error identification is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveerror identification reliabilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system merges multiple data sources (user state monitoring, content sensitivity analysis, user profile information) into a unified error probability calculation. This integration improves reliability by considering multiple factors simultaneously while managing complexity through consolidated processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transforms qualitative user state information and content sensitivity into quantitative parameters that can be processed by the function F(U,S,P). This parameter transformation enables reliable error probability calculation while maintaining system manageability through standardized inputs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Manufacturing precision

If annotations are provided to indicate distraction levels and error probabilities, then manufacturing precision is improved, but loss of time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontent creation accuracyVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies annotations selectively rather than universally. It focuses computational resources on identifying and annotating high-risk locations where errors are most likely to occur, rather than annotating every element. This partial action approach maintains precision while reducing time loss.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The system provides self-service by automatically generating and applying annotations without requiring manual intervention. The automated calculation of error probabilities and placement of annotations reduces the time burden on users while maintaining high precision in error identification.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Reliability

If user distraction level is monitored and annotated in multimedia content, then reliability of error detection is improved, but ease of operation deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveerror detection reliabilityVSAvoiduser interface simplicity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses color-coded annotations to indicate distraction levels and error probabilities. Different colors represent different risk levels, allowing users to quickly grasp error likelihood without interpreting complex data. This visual encoding maintains reliability while preserving ease of operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #32Color changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a simplified visual copy or representation of the underlying complex data (user state, distraction levels, error probabilities) through annotations. This visual copy conveys essential information in an easily digestible format, maintaining detection reliability while ensuring ease of operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Data Source

PatentUS10528888B2Indentifying locations of potential user errors during manipulation of multimedia content
Publication Date: 2020.01.07 INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINE CORPORATION
  • US10528888B2 patent drawing
  • US10528888B2 patent drawing
  • US10528888B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Disclosed is a novel system and method for indicating a probability of errors in multimedia content. The system determines a user state or possible user distraction level. The user distraction level is indicated in the multimedia content. In one example, work is monitored being performed on the multimedia content. Distractions are identified while the work is being monitored. A probability of errors is calculated in at least one location of the multimedia content by on the distractions that have been identified. Annotations are used to indicate of the probability of errors. In another example, the calculating of probability includes using a function F(U,S,P) based on a combination of: i) a determination of user state (U), ii) a determination of sensitivity (S) of user input, and iii) a determination of user characteristics stored in a profile (P).