Multimedia Context Labeling Interface with ML Feedback

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing multimedia organization systems lack efficiency in labeling and organizing multimedia items due to high cognitive load and inefficiencies in user interaction, particularly in automatically associating context information with multimedia items stored in repositories.

Innovation Solution

A system that utilizes preprocessing techniques, including machine learning prediction models, to automatically generate labels and group multimedia items based on similarity, reducing cognitive load by presenting users with tasks that prioritize confidence scores and semantic similarity, allowing for efficient addition, removal, and confirmation of labels, and iteratively improving the machine learning model with user input.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If automatic labeling is used to organize multimedia items, then labeling efficiency is improved, but labeling accuracy may deteriorate due to prediction errors

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelabeling efficiencyVSAvoidlabeling accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary automatic labeling using machine learning prediction models to generate initial labels for multimedia items before human review. This preliminary action handles the bulk of labeling work efficiently while allowing human users to focus only on correcting errors or refining ambiguous cases, thus maintaining both high productivity and accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates feedback mechanisms where user corrections and confirmations of predicted labels are fed back into the machine learning model to continuously improve prediction accuracy. This feedback loop allows the system to learn from user interactions and reduce prediction errors over time, resolving the contradiction between automated efficiency and accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Measurement precision

If users review and correct individual labels one at a time, then labeling accuracy is maintained, but time consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelabeling accuracyVSAvoidtime consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system merges multiple labeling tasks into batch processing operations, allowing users to review and correct labels for multiple multimedia items simultaneously rather than one at a time. This combining approach maintains accuracy through comprehensive review while dramatically reducing time consumption by parallelizing the review process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The machine learning model performs preliminary sorting and grouping of labels based on predicted confidence scores, presenting users with the most challenging or uncertain labels first. This preliminary organization reduces the time users need to spend reviewing all labels systematically while maintaining high accuracy through targeted human review of critical items.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Speed

If the system processes all multimedia items simultaneously, then processing speed is maintained, but cognitive load on users increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing speedVSAvoidcognitive load
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the large batch of multimedia items into smaller, manageable groups based on predicted label similarities and confidence scores. Users receive and process items in organized batches rather than overwhelming volumes, maintaining processing speed through efficient batch handling while reducing cognitive load through structured presentation and prioritization of items needing review.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies different processing qualities to different items based on their characteristics. High-confidence predictions are processed automatically with minimal user intervention, while low-confidence or ambiguous items receive enhanced human review. This local differentiation allows the system to maintain overall processing speed while reducing user cognitive load by focusing human attention only where needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS11243998B2User interface for context labeling of multimedia items
Publication Date: 2022.02.08 NEBIUS BV
  • US11243998B2 patent drawing
  • US11243998B2 patent drawing
  • US11243998B2 patent drawing

AI summary

In certain embodiments, a neural network may be trained to associated context information with multimedia items. In some embodiments, context predictions for multimedia items may be obtained via a neural network. A first multimedia item and a first task related to a first context prediction for the first multimedia item may be presented on a user interface. A user response to the first task may be obtained via the user interface. Based on the user response to the first task, prediction feedback related to the first context prediction or the first multimedia item may be provided to the neural network to cause the neural network to be updated based on the prediction feedback.