Multimodal AI Embedding Checks for Adversarial Input Detection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Adversarial attacks on multimodal machine learning models exploit vulnerabilities across multiple data modalities, such as images, text, video, and audio, making it challenging to detect inconsistencies and requiring complex defense strategies to ensure robust and safe AI systems.

Innovation Solution

A systematic approach involving the generation of transformed versions of multi-modal inputs, computation of embeddings and activations, and pairwise similarity analysis to detect anomalous or potentially harmful inputs, triggering remediation actions if dissimilarity metrics exceed defined thresholds.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional adversarial attack detection methods targeting single modality are used, then detection simplicity is maintained, but detection effectiveness deteriorates due to inability to detect cross-modal inconsistencies

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection effectivenessVSAvoiddetection complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the multimodal input into individual modalities (e.g., image, text, audio) and processes each modality separately through dedicated embedding models, then combines the results for comprehensive adversarial detection. This allows targeted analysis of each modality while maintaining overall system coherence.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary consistency checking mechanism that mediates between different modality embeddings. This intermediary layer compares cross-modal relationships and identifies inconsistencies that indicate adversarial attacks, bridging the gap between simple single-modality detection and complex multimodal analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Measurement precision

If comprehensive embedding analysis across all modalities is performed, then detection accuracy is improved, but computational cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection accuracyVSAvoidcomputational cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a two-stage detection process where a lightweight preliminary check is performed first, and only inputs that pass this initial filter undergo comprehensive embedding analysis. This partial action approach maintains high detection accuracy for suspicious inputs while reducing computational overhead for benign inputs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent dynamically adjusts analysis parameters such as embedding dimensionality and transformation intensity based on input characteristics. For low-risk inputs, reduced-parameter analysis is performed, while high-risk inputs receive full-parameter comprehensive analysis, optimizing the balance between accuracy and computational cost.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If multiple transformed versions of input are generated for analysis, then robustness against adversarial attacks is improved, but processing time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproverobustnessVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies periodic transformations to the input data, generating transformed versions at regular intervals rather than continuously. This periodic action maintains robustness by sampling the input space effectively while reducing the total number of transformations needed, thereby decreasing processing time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary transformations and analyses on a subset of modalities or input regions before conducting full analysis. This preliminary action identifies obvious adversarial patterns early, allowing the system to skip time-consuming full analysis for clearly malicious or clearly benign inputs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS12505648B1Multimodal AI model protection using embeddings
Publication Date: 2025.12.23 HIDDENLAYER INC
  • US12505648B1 patent drawing
  • US12505648B1 patent drawing
  • US12505648B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Techniques for assessing multi-modal inputs to a machine learning model involve receiving a multimodal input containing an image, producing several transformed versions of that image, and generating embeddings for both the original and transformed images. A pairwise similarity analysis among all embeddings is conducted to determine distance values. Two dissimilarity metrics can then be calculated: one reflecting the differences among the transformed images, and another comparing the original image to its transformed versions. If the dissimilarity among the transformed images is greater than that between the original and transformed images plus a threshold, the system triggers a remediation action. This action either blocks the input from being processed by the machine learning model or prevents the model's output from being returned to the requester, thereby enhancing the reliability and security of the model.