Multimodal Character Recognition to Reduce OCR Over-Correction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing OCR technologies suffer from over-correction issues due to reliance on language models that modify correct recognition results to incorrect ones, leading to inaccurate text recognition.

Innovation Solution

A data processing method that combines visual and audio features to enhance character recognition, reintroducing the original visual feature to correct the language model's output, thereby reducing over-correction by leveraging the strengths of both modalities.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If language models are used to correct character information identified by visual models, then recognition accuracy is improved, but over-correction occurs where correct results are modified to incorrect ones

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecharacter recognition accuracyVSAvoidrecognition result reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a feedback mechanism where the visual model's original recognition results are fed back into the final output alongside the language model's corrections. This allows the system to compare and selectively combine results, preventing the language model from unilaterally over-correcting accurate visual recognitions while still benefiting from its semantic correction capabilities on genuinely erroneous outputs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent merges the output of the visual model (first modal feature) with the corrected output of the language model (second modal feature) to produce the final recognition result. This combination strategy ensures that both the visual model's direct pattern recognition strength and the language model's semantic understanding strength are utilized, while the visual model's original result serves as a safeguard against over-correction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

2Measurement precision

If only corrected second modal feature is used for recognition, then semantic accuracy is improved, but visual feature information is lost leading to over-correction

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesemantic recognition accuracyVSAvoidvisual feature information loss
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by treating different parts of the recognition pipeline differently - the visual model provides global structural recognition while the language model provides local semantic refinement. The final system selectively applies corrections only where needed, preserving visual feature information for cases where the visual model's direct recognition is accurate, while incorporating language model corrections only for cases where semantic context indicates errors.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS20250246015A1Data Processing Method and Related Device
Publication Date: 2025.07.31 HUAWEI TECH CO LTD
  • US20250246015A1 patent drawing
  • US20250246015A1 patent drawing
  • US20250246015A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A data processing method includes obtaining input data, where the input image is image data or audio data; obtaining a second modal feature based on a first modal feature of the input data, where the first modal feature is a visual feature of the image data or an audio feature of the audio data, and the second modal feature is a character feature; and fusing the first modal feature and the second modal feature to obtain a target feature.